I love my KPA500. I don't use it enough because of all the low power digital I do. I was wondering if the quality of my signal would better if I let the KPA500 produce the output even if the wattage is 50 or less watts. If I drive it with 1 to 5 watts, it produces 10 to 50 watts. I like the thought of offloading the thermal load of my long JT65 & JT9 duty cycles onto the KPA rather than my main rig which is a Flex 6700.
Does the KPA500 make a much cleaner signal than the built in barefoot amp because its running at such a higher voltage? I'm not too concerned about power efficiency comparisons, because we know its not more efficient doing it this way. :) Thx -Chris ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
