I agree with you David, I think there are a lot of other things that
would be much more useful to a much larger audience than receive-only SSTV.
I'm still working at what the "ideal" span on my P3 would be, in the
NAQP SSB yesterday, I had it at 100 KHz and it seemed pretty good. For
CW, I have been running at 50 KHz because the signals are so much closer
together ... I'll give CW a try at 100 KHz and see how that works. My
K3 is S/N 642, and I'm still playing around with how to use it and what
to set things at. Yet another new dimension to ham radio.
73,
Fred K6DGW
- Northern California Contest Club
- CU in the 2014 Cal QSO Party 4-5 Oct 2014
- www.cqp.org
On 8/17/2014 3:37 PM, david Moes wrote:
I agree with those that would like to see TX monitoring and how about
wider range it'd be handy for quick looks at say 10m for activity to
see 400 or 500 KHZ.
I do some SSTV and enjoy it I think there are more of us than you
think and not just the fools on 14.230 sending soft porn. however if
I want to play SSTV I am running MMSSTV anyway that has good templates
sending and lots of function, ability to store images etc. I am not
sure just to add the ability to monitor incoming pictures would be a
good use of resources. unless you are planning to implement something
with MMSSTV's level of capability. adding more comprehensive
RTTY/psk function or perhaps JT65/9 or even a simple logger so I don't
need to drag the the PC when outside the shack would be nice. just
pie in the sky thing there.
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
