On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV <li...@subich.com> wrote:
>
>> At present the K3 has... let's call it an "oversight"... in the way
>> that it memorizes data sub-modes. It correctly memorizes the
>> last-used data sub-mode on each band, but not the bandwidth setting
>> appropriate to that sub-mode. Instead, the bandwidth settings for
>> *all* data sub-modes on *all* bands are overwritten by the settings
>> for whichever sub-mode was most recently used on *any* band. This is
>> often quite inappropriate, and inconvenient for anyone whose
>> interests cover a range of data sub-modes.
>>
>>
>> That problem needs to be fixed in the K3/KX3 firmware before moving
>> on to upgrade to automate the display settings of the P3 and the
>> PX3.
>
>
> Agreed - and one of those user interface issues to which I referred
> earlier in this thread.  DATA A and AFSK A/FSK D need separate default
> bandwidth (2.8 or 4 KHz for DATA A, 500 Hz for AFSK A/FSK D) and the
> last used BW/FC values need to be stored per sub-mode/band.

+1

73,

    ~iain / N6ML





> On 2014-08-18 10:10 AM, Ian White wrote:
>>
>> I would agree with that... but first, there is another point that needs
>> to be rationalized in the K3 (and, I presume, the KX3 also).
>>
>> DATA is not a single mode - it is only a "folder name" for a collection
>> of different data sub-modes. Many of those sub-modes require quite
>> different settings for the transceiver bandwidth and center frequency;
>> and that is equally true about the optimum bandwidths for a visual
>> display.
>>
>> At present the K3 has... let's call it an "oversight"... in the way that
>> it memorizes data sub-modes. It correctly memorizes the last-used data
>> sub-mode on each band, but not the bandwidth setting appropriate to that
>> sub-mode. Instead, the bandwidth settings for *all* data sub-modes on
>> *all* bands are overwritten by the settings for whichever sub-mode was
>> most recently used on *any* band. This is often quite inappropriate, and
>> inconvenient for anyone whose interests cover a range of data sub-modes.
>>
>>
>> That problem needs to be fixed in the K3/KX3 firmware before moving on
>> to upgrade to automate the display settings of the P3 and the PX3.
>>
>>
>> 73 from Ian GM3SEK
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of
>>
>> Joe
>>>
>>> Subich, W4TV
>>> Sent: 18 August 2014 13:17
>>> To: Wayne Burdick
>>> Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Slow-scan TV (SSTV) display on the P3 and PX3?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2014-08-18 1:10 AM, Wayne Burdick wrote:
>>>>
>>>> We're considering per-mode as well,
>>>
>>>
>>> I agree that per mode is more valuable than per band.  I'm nearly
>>> always changing span when I change modes (10 KHz on CW, 20 KHz on
>>> data, 50 or 100 KHz on Phone) but not generally changing span with
>>> bands unless I've also changed mode.
>>>
>>> 73,
>>>
>>>     ... Joe, W4TV
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2014-08-18 1:10 AM, Wayne Burdick wrote:
>>>>
>>>> We're considering per-mode as well, but at the moment we're
>>>
>>> experimenting with per-band. Input welcome.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Wayne
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 17, 2014, at 10:07 PM, Matt VK2RQ <matt.vk...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Would it make more sense for it to be per-mode rather than per-band?
>>>
>>> For example, I can imagine on CW you might want to zoom in more than on
>>> SSB. Maybe some P3 owners can comment?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 73, Matt VK2RQ
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 18 Aug 2014, at 3:01 pm, Wayne Burdick <n...@elecraft.com>
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We just added per-band SPAN settings to the PX3 (and will later add
>>
>> it
>>>
>>> to the P3). We're also adding a menu setting to quantize the SPAN
>>> selections to 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, and 200 kHz. This behavior would
>>
>> be user-
>>>
>>> selectable; the default would be continuously variable, as it is at
>>
>> present.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For a lot of P3/PX3 users, the combination of these two changes
>>
>> will
>>>
>>> result in less manipulation of the SPAN control, and will save some Fn
>>> switches for other uses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wayne
>>>>>> N6KR
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Aug 17, 2014, at 9:45 PM, Jim Brown
>>>
>>> <j...@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun,8/17/2014 7:18 PM, Fred Jensen wrote:
>>>>>>>> I'm still working at what the "ideal" span on my P3 would be, in
>>
>> the
>>>
>>> NAQP SSB yesterday, I had it at 100 KHz and it seemed pretty good.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have five of the function keys programmed for different span
>>>
>>> settings. The other three are Peak Toggle, Fixed Mode Toggle, and Noise
>>> Blanker Toggle.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I use 2 kHz for looking at the quality of CW signals, 10 kHz for
>>
>> most CW
>>>
>>> pileups, 50 kHz, 100 kHz, and 200 kHz for contesting and general
>>
>> operating.
>>>
>>> I did have 20 kHz programmed, but gave that up for the NB toggle.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Before each contest, I'll run through all the bands and set up the
>>
>> span
>>>
>>> and centering. 50/60 kHz is pretty good for Sprints and state QSO
>>
>> parties,
>>>
>>> 100 kHz is good for most CW contests, 200 kHz is not wide enough for
>>
>> some
>>>
>>> SSB contests.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For 6M, I set a 200 kHz span from 50.080 to 50.280. This lets me
>>
>> see
>>>
>>> CW, SSB, and JT65.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 73, Jim K9YC
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>>>> Message delivered to matt.vk...@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>>>
>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>> Message delivered to li...@subich.com
>>>>
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>>
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>> Message delivered to gm3...@ifwtech.co.uk
>>
>>
>>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to a...@dseven.org
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to