Yes, KHz, of course. Didn’t have the courage to consume 4KHz :—) but I did answer the Elecraft net call at 1800z at 3KHz.
> On Nov 17, 2014, at 10:29 AM, Phil Wheeler <w...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > > I think you meant KHz, not MHz, David :-) > > My thinking is that the narrower "communications quality" signal would be > more effective. > > How did you find 4KHz with none of those contesters on it? Incredible > accomplishment! > > 73, Phil W7OX > > On 11/17/14 10:22 AM, David Ahrendts wrote: >> Experimented yesterday for a few minutes with ESSB (carefully avoiding >> weekend contesters), and it raised a fundamental question: As bandwidth is >> broadened, is effective radiated power diluted? In other words, will 500 >> watts with a 2.6MHz signal be more effective (stronger, punchier, more DBs >> transmitted) than 500 watts with a 4MHz ESSB signal? >> >> David Ahrendts, KC0XT >> >> >> >> David Ahrendts davidahren...@me.com > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to davidahren...@me.com David Ahrendts davidahren...@me.com ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
