This seems to have things really screwed up. Yes, the Bird 43 is a 5% of F.S. accuracy instrument. The Bird 43P is somewhat less accurate, although 5% F S with carrier, and more like 8% F S or so in peak mode. In measuring a 100 watt radio with a 100 watt F S slug would seem to be most accurate. Total accuracy decreases as the indicated value approaches the left side of the scale. Now using a 250 watt slug to measure a 100 watt radio, the earlier states that most accuracy is to the left of center, which by the way, is the compressed side of the scale. This makes no sense as the scale markings are much more difficult to approximate. In fact the most accurate area is to the right of center toward full scale is the expanded scale which is where the highest accuracy actually occurs. With a 100 watt radio and a 100 watt F S slug the error is +/- 5 watts at 100 watts. Using a 250 watt element and measuring 100 watts near center scale the error is more like +/- 12.5 watts or 5% of the F S value.

If one measures the same power source with identical elements and gets different results, they should refrain from buying ham fest elements for indeed the elements are not identical. To wit, I purchased 3 new 100 watt elements and 3 new 2500 watt elements. They all give identical results +/- the width of the pointer. I don't buy ham fest Bird elements as I find they are junk and not worth the brass they contain.

And remember, Bird 43 instruments are calibrated for only a 50 resistive load. Any other load being used leaves one with a "best guess" situation as to actual power.

73
Bob, K4TAX
K3S s/n 10,163

On 8/21/2015 11:48 PM, Wes (N7WS) wrote:
So by your "logic" it would be best to measure one Watt using a 100W element.

On 8/21/2015 8:03 PM, Ken G Kopp wrote:
Bird accuracy is specified to be +/- 5% of meter full scale ... a 100W
element would be a poor choice to measure a 100W output level. Take a look at any Bird's meter scale. It's not linear and can be read with the most
accuracy to the left of center scale.  A 250W element is much better for
measuring 100W.

Wanna chase your tail? Measure the same power source with identical Bird
elements......

Don's method is better, but all methods are obviously subject to the
accuracy of the final indicating instrument.

FWIW .....

73l



______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to rmcg...@blomand.net





______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to