Hi Dave, As you described, having both a Sub RX and a P3 are a great asset for working split operations. One area where the P3 excels is finding a quiet spot to transmit. It's not always as obvious with the Sub RX. With a modest station it may not be beneficial to jump on the exact frequency of the last QSO. A clear frequency can be a better choice.
73, Mike K2MK dyarnes-2 wrote > Hi All, > > I just worked V73D, but not sure how I would have done it without using > the > 2nd RX. I love my P3, but for DX stuff the 2nd RX always seems to be the > difference. In this case, V73D was moving up slightly after just about > every QSO, and not sure the P3 tells you that! The DX clusters don't > really > help that much. By the time you see the split indicated, it has probably > changed a good bit. If I didn't have the 2nd RX, I would be dependent on > "outhouse luck" or brute force, neither of which is a strong suit here! > Hi. > By the way, my QSO's with the TX3X gang were also quick and relatively > easy > thanks to the 2nd RX. Anyway, both tools are great, but I suggest adding > the 2nd RX first, if only one can be added at the moment--at least if > working DX is your goal. > > Dave W7AQK -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/P3-Vs-2nd-RX-tp7609052p7609053.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
