Of course that would only work for CW DX. Is there any other?
73, Deni - F5VJC On 14 October 2015 at 22:39, Ken <wa8...@gmail.com> wrote: > I wonder if a CW skimmer would work as well or even better, assuming that > it can pick out the call signs. Of course that would only work for CW DX. > > Ken WA8JXM > > On 10/14/15 9:27 AM, w7aqk wrote: > >> I just worked V73D, but not sure how I would have done it without using >> the 2nd RX. I love my P3, but for DX stuff the 2nd RX always seems to be >> the difference. In this case, V73D was moving up slightly after just about >> every QSO, and not sure the P3 tells you that! The DX clusters don't >> really help that much. By the time you see the split indicated, it has >> probably changed a good bit. If I didn't have the 2nd RX, I would be >> dependent on "outhouse luck" or brute force, neither of which is a strong >> suit here! Hi. By the way, my QSO's with the TX3X gang were also quick and >> relatively easy thanks to the 2nd RX. Anyway, both tools are great, but I >> suggest adding the 2nd RX first, if only one can be added at the moment--at >> least if working DX is your goal. >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to foxfive....@gmail.com > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
