One point I've learned over the years is the fact baluns, regardless of
the ratio, are power rated at matched values. i.e. a 1:1 is typically a
50 ohm to 50 ohm while a 4:1 is nominally a 200 ohm to 50 ohm device.
And the power rating is mostly at closely matched values. Hence a 4:1
balun is good for feeding a 1/2 wave folded dipole which, at nominal
height above ground, is about 200 to 300 ohms where as a 1:1 balun is
good for a 1/2 wave dipole at near resonant frequency.
Therefore a 4:1 balun may be good for say 1KW if the Z's are correct.
Try to use one on a complex reactive load and the 1KW rating fails
rather quickly. For that reason, for any balun I use and choose, it is
rated at 5x to 10x the expected power. Thus a 1KW balun is good for
about 100 watts. I recently "smoked badly" a 4:1 known brand 5KW
balun on 160M with my AM transmitter at legal limit when I connected the
80M folded dipole antenna in error Shouldn't have done that. The
transmitter didn't care but lots of smoke came out of the balun box.
73
Bob, K4TAX
On 10/25/2015 2:57 PM, Fred Jensen wrote:
Yep, almost. The word "balun" is a portmanteau of "balanced" and
"unbalanced." They are transformers or auto-transformers and their
job is to keep a balanced feed to the antenna balanced when
transitioning to unbalanced coax. Since they're transformers, they
can also transform the impedance.
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com