j...@kk9a.com wrote > Even if this works for your noise, I wonder how well it will work using a > wide roofing filter in contest conditions. > > Perhaps for RX testing only you can select a different narrower TX filter?
Definitely would not work in high activity contests, but fencer clicks would be buried in all the other mess anyway. ;-) I do have a 2.1 in Main which I'll try the next time I experiment. Unfortunately I don't have that in Sub which precludes diversity, which I use for weak signals that the clicks bother. BTW you can NEVER select a narrower TX filter than 2.7/2.8 because the firmware/software will not allow it (even for CW). I know because I tried to do that years ago in an attempt to further cleanse my CW signal. Now the KSYN3A does a great job of that anyway. When I do another experiment with the 2.1, I'll report the results here. 73, Bill W4ZV -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-K3S-noise-blanker-performance-greatly-enhanced-at-my-QTH-need-testers-tp7613491p7613681.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
