Jay,
As promised, I went ahead and measured my K3 sensitivity. It is really
a K3S-. It doesn't have the USB I/O board but has the rest of the K3 ->
K3S upgrades. There general coverage bandpass filter board is installed.
Here are the results on 20-6M.
The sensitivities are as expected and comparable to other rigs'
published results. They also seem to agree reasonably well with more
well equipped lab K3 results. I don't claim well equipped lab accuracy.
Condx:
1) SubRX off, attenuator off
2) CW mode
3) 400 Hz filter in
4) Measured the S/N with Spectrogram. These numbers are based upon a 10
db S/N ratio. That also happens to be the MDS I can hear +/- a few dB.
On the 12,10,6M bands a 20 db S/N was measured and then subtracted 10 dB
from the result. This is to eliminate possible signal generator leakage
effects. The K3 audio output is very linear with RF signal level input
so this is a reasonable thing to do.
BAND no preamp preamp1 preamp2
20 -144 dBm -147 x
17 -143 -145 x
15 -143 -147 x
12 -144 -144 -154
10 -143 -145 -156
6 -136 -141 -151
I'm not sure I believe the -15x numbers. Elecraft does say preamp 2 is
ultra low noise.
Measurement setup:
HP-8657B signal generator with additional internal shielding.
20 db attenuator at the generator output.
double shielded RG-400 coax to K3 antenna.
HP-8657B output verified with an HP-3586C up to 30 MHz down to -122 dBm.
Spectrogram on a Delta 44 sound card to measure S/N.
Signal measured from K3 line out.
YMMV
73 de Brian/K3KO
P.S. Switching in the second RX reduces these numbers about 3 dB.
On 1/29/2017 3:55 AM, jay Miller wrote:
I assembled my K3/100 with the second receiver in December of 2010. The
weak signal performance was much better than my original IC-756 rig. I did
not install the automatic antenna tuner. I have continued to download the
software changes since then.
Two years ago I installed the general coverage receiver modification. I
thought it was my imagination at the time but I thought had experienced a
slight decrease in the primary and secondary receiver sensitivity.
Today I put my Kenwood TS-480 that I had been using as a mobile in the
shack. I was listing to a couple of weak strength SSB QSOs using the K3.
Out of curiosity I switched over to the TS-480 and was surprised that the
weak signals were more "copy-able" on the inexpensive Kenwood than on the
K3. Does this indicate a problem with the RX in the K3 or is the apparent
difference in the TS-480 RF gain come at the price of the definitely poorer
adjacent signal rejection?
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to als...@comcast.net
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
