Hi Chris,

Thanks for your comments. 

Of course the design goal for the KX2 was to pack as many bands, modes, and 
features into the smallest possible size, not to break records on RX 
measurements. Nonetheless, I'd expect the KX2 to come in somewhere in the top 
20 or so on Rob's list. We'll see.

73,
Wayne
N6KR


On Mar 9, 2017, at 2:47 PM, Chris Tate - N6WM <ct...@ewnetinc.com> wrote:

> Thanks Gus this will be interesting.  For me the KX2 could perform worse that 
> it probably will, and I would still love it for its portability and down 
> right cool factor.  That thing and a couple of small bundles of wire has you 
> qrv anywhere in the world~  what a great little transceiver!
> 
> Chris
> N6WM
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: Elecraft [elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] on behalf of Augie "Gus" 
> Hansen [augie.han...@comcast.net]
> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2017 2:34 PM
> To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX2 and Sherwood Eng. RX Performance Ranking?
> 
> I just spoke to Rob on the phone. His lab in Denver is just a few miles
> from where I live and he will be testing my KX2 as soon as I can get it
> to him.
> 
> We had previously tested my Ten-Tec Omni V back when it first hit the
> market, and it was quite an eye opener for me to see his well equipped
> lab and to observe the testing procedures he uses. (I also ended up
> buying all the mods for my R-4C as well as several filters and an SE-3.
> That's still a fine RX for both ham band use and SW listening.)
> 
> Gus Hansen
> KB0YH

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to