I'm thinking of a second rig and that possibly being an Elecraft. Here's
the deal:
1. I've been spoiled or demanding, take your pick. Before I went
inactive about 10 years ago, my rig was the Kenwood TS 930 which, by all
accounts, had an excellent receiver. With modest antennas, I worked
over 150 WAZ zones. The ability to do relatively (or actual!) weak
signal HF work with it was important. I did not get my results
primarily from stacked monobanders on 20 and working pileups. That was
not me and probably never will be.
2. I now have the SDR 1000 as my primary rig. This rig was an idle
dream of mine ten years ago brought to life today. I love the rig. It,
too, has a pretty hot receiver, among many other things. No use
pretending this one won't receive the bulk of my attention, now and always.
However, the SDR 1000 is currently my only rig. I'm looking at some
sort of secondary rig because there are times and places I just can't
take today's SDR 1000 and there is no SDR <something else> even in prospect.
Requirements for the second rig:
1. Be able to be put it into the station as a primary rig. Obviously
to even be talking about the K1 or KX1 means a little compromise here.
But, (cover your eyes QRPers) there is an Ameritron 500M that I could
put in-line to get something like 40 watts output if I wanted to. A
compromise to be sure over the 100 I normally run (the Ameritron is
mostly used to boost my RTTY signal -- seldom over 100 watts anyhow), so
that isn't as compromised as it sounds. Maybe the recent sunspot down
cycle will do me in, but even with what I have, I've made reliable
digital contacts with 30 watts on 40 and 20 meters in 2005. That would
get me by while the SDR was in the shop (SDR's maker, Flex-radio, has
offered regular upgrades for reasonable prices and I'm due for another).
2. Be able to take mobile / portable / backpacking. The SDR can also
be used in these roles, within limits. At a cabin with 110 VAC, the SDR
works fine. In a true backpacking role, I don't think so (the wonderful
SDR receiver is too power hungry, for starters). Mobile probably works
with the SDR, but it seems comparatively awkward compared to something
more basic, especially as this would be a car and not an RV or camper or
something where the SDR would be better served. I'm not a big
backpacker and so on, but I do some of it (e.g., the Boundary Waters
Canoe Area) and if I bother to take the gear, I'd like to have something
that hears well in addition to working well. I'm probably more likely
to use the rig in that role than true automobile mobiling, on my known
history.
I'd like have as many bands available as common sense allows. Interests
change over time as does the sun.
Here's the pros and cons as I so far see it (but, assume maximum ignorance):
1. The K2 (if I bothered with it) would be a pretty "full out" order.
Probably:
K2 K2 HF Transceiver 599.00
KPA100 K2/100 Internal Int. Kit (w/RS232) 369.00
KDSP2 Advanced K2 DSP Filter 219.00
KSDB2 K2 SSB Option (includes RTTY et. al.) 99.00
K160RX K2 160M / 2nd RX antenna 39.00
FDIMP Finger Dimple for K1/K2 4.50
The truth is, while this is probably what I'd want to do, this is also
probably too rich for my blood for a second rig.
2. The KX1 would be another possible choice. Probably:
KX1 CW Xcvr 289.00
KXAT1 Internal ATU 79.00
KXB3080 30/80m adapter 65.00
3. The K1 is so far in third place, but maybe it will jump up a bit.
The K2 may be too rich for my blood after all (especially for a second
rig) and I would miss 17 meters. Probably:
K1-2 K1 w band 5W CW transceiver 289.00
KFL1-4 Additional Four Band Module 129.00 (all six bands, I presume)
K1BKLTKIT-X Backlight mod kit 14.95
KAT1 Internal Auto antenna tuner 99.00
KBT1 Internal battery adapter 44.00
KNB1 K1 Noise Blanker 35.00
FDIMP Finger Dimple for K1/K2 4.50
Still at about 630 dollars, shipped, the K1 is a bit step up in weight
and price over the KX1. And, neither would allow data, which I would
miss as much as SSB (actually, I wouldn't miss SSB all that much --
doing nearly none of it now -- RTTY matters, though).
So, on the capability side, it would be all about operational
convenience versus added weight, I assume. The main drawback of the KX1
over the K1 for me would be the loss of 17 meters. I'm mostly into DX,
so losing 80 in a QRP mode would not be a big crushing loss. I don't
(yet anyway) have the antenna farm to seriously think about 80 meter QRP DX.
Keep in mind, too, that I simply am not a builder. Don't waste your
time suggesting it (three solder joints is a lot for me). I'd have to
work with one of the builders (seems easy enough -- e-mails are
pending), but it boosts these prices a bit over Elecraft list.
Obviously, I could just run out and get an old TS 430 or something for
maybe 500 dollars and have done with it (and have SSB/RTTY besides), but
I really do insist, these days, on the kind of receiver I've become
accustomed to. So, it probably is some refinement of the above or
simply doing without.
As I read through the above, the "dark horse" option might be:
1. The K2 "not so full out after all." Probably:
K2 K2 HF Transceiver 599.00
KSDB2 K2 SSB Option (includes RTTY et. al.) 99.00
K160RX K2 160M / 2nd RX antenna 39.00
FDIMP Finger Dimple for K1/K2 4.50
This would be a good compromise from a money point of view, and it has
all the basic capabilities in terms of bands, and has data/SSB as well.
It would have the same output with the Ameritron, I presume, so would be
good from that standpoint as well.
But, would it be too heavy to take on foot? Do I need the KX1 from a
power point of view to even think about putting it in the pack?
Your thoughts would obviously be much appreciated. . .
Larry WO0Z
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
