Andy -
Sounds like a great idea.
- Paul
6/22/2018, ANDY DURBIN wrote:
"Clearly there has to be some hysteresis to stop hunting. 25% of a
segment width might width be a good number to choose, but this would
require the current frequency counter to have improved resolution."
Why wouldn't it be preferable to use the transceiver's exact TX
frequency, if available, for learning and selection ? Yes, I
understand that Elecraft likes to give the detected RF frequency the
highest priority. However, the logic required to allow use of
transceiver frequency if difference from RF defected frequency did
not exceed a defined limit would not seem to be too complex.
73,
Andy k3wyc
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to p...@paulbaldock.com
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com