I think the point was that a comparison between the two isn't
meaningful. I think (based on experience as an early adopter of both)
that the IC-7300 is outstanding bit of kit for the money.
The K3x performance is a bargain when compared to other company's
top-end radios.
Doug -- KJ0F
On 7/4/2018 11:23 AM, Clay Autery wrote:
I tried a friend's IC-7300 out.... OK for the money, but I would not
trade my Elecraft for ALL the money I paid for it PLUS a FREE IC-7300.
______________________
Clay Autery, KY5G
(318) 518-1389
On 04-Jul-18 12:11, Doug Person wrote:
I didn't see any comparison chart for the K3S and the IC-7610. I did
see the comparison of the K3S with the IC-7300. This made me laugh.
By the time you add up the required options for the K3S to achieve
feature parity with the IC-7300 it costs 3 times as much. This
actually makes the IC-7300 look like a really good deal. The IC-7300
is, after all, an entry level radio.
I'll never stop being impressed by the ability of the K3/K3S. But, to
me, it is no longer cost competitive. The only advantage the K3S has
today is it has one of the best receivers. I doubt this advantage
will last much longer.
Doug -- KJ0F
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to d...@kj0f.com
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
