I've long had mixed feelings about MFJ.  They have some very
interesting, innovative, and cost-competitive products.  However
sometimes the quality isn't there.  For example I have an MFJ antenna
analyzer that was intermittent until I fixed a poor ground connection. 
I forget the details, but as I recall the problem was partly one of
design. 

Alan N1AL 

On 2019-04-07 09:28, Wayne Burdick wrote:

> I've used many MFJ products and in have had very little trouble with any of 
> them. For example, I make frequent use an MFJ-223 hand-held VNA -- it's 
> versatile and does the job. I've also used their manual tuners, antenna 
> switches, and portable/mobile whips. They have a very comprehensive product 
> line that's really unique in the industry.
> 
> That said, I do have some suggestions for MFJ's engineering team on how they 
> might improve their ATU. 
> 
> Looking at the photo, I see that they used much smaller toroidal cores for 5 
> of the 8 inductors in the L network. This could result in excessive heating, 
> especially on the higher bands, at full power into a worst-case match. We 
> specified T68 sized cores to remain conservative based on extensive testing. 
> Also, if you click on the photo to see the details, you'll see what appears 
> to be very inconsistent hand soldering of the SMD components. While this 
> doesn't necessarily worsen performance or reliability, it should be done in a 
> way that inspires confidence in the buyer. (Easy for me to say, of course. We 
> have the luxury of mass-producing these assemblies using automated 
> pick-and-place equipment at our fabricator in Monterey.)
> 
> Wayne
> N6KR
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to