ON4UN's Low Band DXing book is on sale for $20 right now. Get that and you’ll 
know as much as anybody about radials.

https://www.arrl.org/shop/ON4UN-s-Low-Band-DXing 
<https://www.arrl.org/shop/ON4UN-s-Low-Band-DXing>

wunder
K6WRU
Walter Underwood
CM87wj
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)

> On Aug 25, 2020, at 8:14 PM, David Gilbert <ab7e...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> If you are going to go with buried radials, I don't think 4 or 5 of them is 
> going to do a very good job for you.
> 
> Like N7WS recommended, look up N6LF's work and read it carefully. Seriously.
> 
> 73,
> Dave   AB7E
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 8/25/2020 5:31 PM, kevinr wrote:
>> I have to be very careful of raised wires on my property.  If they are not 
>> above the height of an elk's antlers I am in trouble.  I plan to bury them.  
>> This is something I've never done before which has its own merit.  I have 
>> plenty of wire scrap from broken antennas so the non-resonant, buried 
>> radials work better for my circumstances.  I need to calculate the feed 
>> point impedance to see if I need to design a balun for the system to work.  
>> Once my main project is done I'll have more time for modeling each method.
>> 
>>    Thanks for all the ideas guys,
>> 
>>        73,  Kevin.  KD5ONS
>> 
>> 
>> On 8/25/20 5:23 PM, Wes wrote:
>>> You probably should get acquainted with Rudy Severns, N6LF. 
>>> (https://www.antennasbyn6lf.com/)  He has written more than you ever want 
>>> to know about vertical antennas,
>>> 
>>> More specifically to your case, are you planning the radials to be 
>>> elevated?  If so, they need to be the same length, in fact some effort 
>>> should be made to get all of the currents the same. The last thing you want 
>>> is a fifty ohm feedpoint impedance with a shortened vertical (which is what 
>>> an L is).  There is evidence that elevated radials are an improvement over 
>>> on-the-ground or buried radials.  Mine are on the ground, mainly because 1) 
>>> I didn't want to give up radiator height to raise the radials, 2) all of 
>>> the big guns bury theirs and I don't have room for full length radials 
>>> anyway in my cactus patch.  See my QRZ page for evidence.
>>> 
>>> My modeling shows a little bit of directivity away from the horizontal 
>>> wire, but it's negligible.
>>> 
>>> Wes  N7WS
>>> 
>>> On 8/25/2020 4:23 PM, kevinr wrote:
>>>> From what I can find, and what I can calculate, five wires, each ~130 feet 
>>>> long, could make a nice inverted L for 160 meters.  One leg for the 
>>>> vertical and horizontal portion of the antenna.  Four legs for the 
>>>> counterpoise (ground plane).  There are many broken wire antennas stored 
>>>> in my shed which are fodder for the radials. Do all of the legs for the 
>>>> counterpoise need to be 1/4 wavelength or can I substitute some shorter 
>>>> lengths?  The feedpoint should somewhere above 50 ohms impedance.  As I 
>>>> add more radials that number will reach 50 ohms asymptotically.
>>>> 
>>>> I can get the vertical part up to 70 or 80 feet above ground with the rest 
>>>> of it horizontal.  Most of the radiation should take place from the 
>>>> vertical part since it is closer to the feed point.  But there should be 
>>>> some effect from the direction of the horizontal portion.  How strongly 
>>>> does the direction of the horizontal portion effect the radiation pattern 
>>>> of the antenna system?  My property allows me to point it from 300 degrees 
>>>> around to 200 degrees so I have plenty of options.  Between 200 and 300 
>>>> degrees there is a road used by loggers, and the folks maintaining the 
>>>> towers at the top of this mountain.  They can break any antenna lower than 
>>>> 80 feet above ground.  Spar poles and cranes clear out any dead limbs 
>>>> across the road.
>>>> 
>>>> Inquiring minds...
>>>> 
>>>> Kevin.  KD5ONS
>>>> 
>>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>>> 
>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>> Message delivered to wes_n...@triconet.org 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>> 
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>> Message delivered to kev...@coho.net 
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to ab7e...@gmail.com 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to wun...@wunderwood.org

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com 

Reply via email to