Yes, I completely agree with that. I'm sure the folks with low EDZ's
and large horizontal loops and low dipoles make contacts on 160m, but
almost any half decent vertical will reach out further better.
73,
Dave AB7E
On 8/26/2020 11:32 AM, j...@kk9a.com wrote:
With only four radials he might be wasting 2/3 of his RF however I
would still take that inefficient inverted L over a 30' high dipole on
160m.
John KK9A
David Gilbert AB7E wrote:
Four buried radials won't model well at
all in NEC2, but it also doesn't make a very good antenna.
73,
Dave AB7E
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to ab7e...@gmail.com
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
