I never said that there was anything wrong with using a counterpoise.  On the contrary, it makes a ton of sense to use one if at all possible ... it's most likely the best radiator in any similar system.

I'm not "claiming" that a resistor with a counterpoise is as effective as a short loaded whip with a counterpoise ... but my suspicion is that it's close and I think it would be interesting to see the difference.

73,
Dave   AB7E


On 9/21/2022 10:12 PM, Dan Presley wrote:
I believe what Wayne meant to say was’now replace the AX1 with a resistor’ not 
a wire. Nonetheless the AX1 and 2 still serve a definite purpose in portable 
operating that a resistor or light bulb won’t 🤪. And I fail to see what the 
problem is with using a counterpoise,even if it’s doing some of the radiating. 
Most antenna systems that are unbalanced (verticals,end feds,etc) require a 
counterpoise. Are you claiming that a resistor with a counterpoise is as 
effective as shortened vertical?? I believe Rudy Severn’s work has already 
demonstrated the effectiveness of short verticals with various counterpoises.
Yesterday I did a SOTA activation where I worked Japan,France and Spain with 5W 
and the AX1. Obviously the altitude advantage is great and I used 3 13’ 
radials. I also try to position myself near a sloping edge to maximize my 
radiation effectiveness (as Tom Schiller N6BT advocates). I doubt a 50 ohm 
resistor would achieve this… and just in case someone says ‘it’s only because 
the other stations have big antennas etc ‘ some of the contacts were what we 
call ‘S2S’ or summit to summit with other activators using similar equipment 
and power. Perhaps hiking to a bare summit and figuring out what gear you’d 
haul on your back will give you a certain perspective and appreciation.


Dan Presley 503-701-3871
danpresley@me. com
n7...@arrl.net


On Sep 21, 2022, at 20:32, David Gilbert <ab7e...@gmail.com> wrote:

Why would I replace the wire with a resistor?  I was talking about replacing 
the AX1 with a resistor and keeping the wire.

I have no doubt that an AX1 without a wire hears better than a resistor without 
a wire, but that's mostly because the resistor provides a better match and 
can't rely on body capacitance or the coax shield.

If the AX1 was less expensive I'd buy one and do the tests.  I may be totally 
wrong, but I still say that ANY tuned short whip with a counterpoise is doing 
most of the radiating from the counterpoise.

73,
Dave   AB7E



On 9/21/2022 7:59 PM, Wayne Burdick wrote:
Dave,

I've done many variations on whip antenna tests.

A resonant 4' whip with or without a counterpoise is on a different planet from 
a resistor. If an AX1 were listening in on this conversation, it would 
challenge you to a duel, with live ammo :)

In fact the counterpoise is absolutely required for transmit, but you can get 
away without it on receive, where body capacitance to ground alone will 
suffice, even on the HF bands.

Try this test: Go outdoors and connect an AX1 (or equivalent) to the antenna 
jack of any 20 meter receiver. With r without the counterpoise You'll get of 
noise, lots of signals.

Now replace the wire with a resistor.

Nothing.

QED....

Wayne
N6KR





On Sep 21, 2022, at 7:29 PM, David Gilbert <ab7e...@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, the reason I mentioned the 50 ohm resistor is that a year or so ago 
somebody on this reflector mentioned that he did a direct comparison between an 
AX1 with the recommended 13 foot wire counterpoise and with no counterpoise at 
all.  I don't remember for certain but I think he said he used the RBN.   I do 
remember that he said the difference in signal strength was about 30 db.  For 
grins I used EZNEC to model a single 50 hm resistor 15 feet off the ground with 
and without a 13 foot wire hanging from one end of it.  I got 30 db difference 
in calculated signal strength.
I am by no means claiming that is a definitive or even relevant test ... I just 
think it would be interesting to actually do an empirical comparison.
It is my opinion, however, that most of the radiating on an AX1 (or any other 
short loaded whip) is being done by the counterpoise wire and/or the shield of 
the coax.  The coil and whip are matching aids.  If so, it's possible that a 
resistor would accomplish the same thing.  ;)
As I said, I'd be willing to do the comparison if anyone is willing to lend me 
an AX1.  I'd be happy to be proven wrong.
73,
Dave   AB7E
On 9/21/2022 6:46 PM, j...@kk9a.com wrote:
Thomas Schiller, N6BT once wrote an article titled "Everything Works". In
the article he discussed how he worked all continents on CW (a mode that you
can actually hear) using a light bulb antenna during the ARRL DX contest.
The AX1 appears to be a 45" whip with a base inductor made of 20AWG wire. I
am not sure what is inside the base, if anything, to bring the impedance up
to 50 ohms. With some sunspots, I am sure that it is fun for pedestrian
mobile use which is what it's designed for. A 1/2wl dipole or 1/4wl vertical
will be a much better radiator.
John KK9A
David Gilbert ab7e wrote:
A comparison to any other antenna would be useful.  A comparison to a 50
ohm resistor with a similar counterpoise wire would be even more useful
as a baseline measurement.  If anyone wants to lend me their AX1 I will
do that.
73,
Dave   AB7E
On 9/19/2022 10:33 AM, Ron Gruner wrote:
I've been impressed by how well my little AX-1 whip antenna performs on 20
meters. Here's a photo of the rig: https://gruner.com/k4rhg/andover_ma.png
and the propagation map:
https://gruner.com/k4rhg/wspr_2watts_sep16_2022.png
A friend, Derek Rowell (AK1WI), gave me a two-watt WSPR kit he had
designed
-- easy and fun to build. I connected the unit to the AX-1 sitting in a
window sill facing west and strung the out-of-the-box counterpoise over a
lamp shade and bed headboard. No idea what the SWR is, but it must be
pretty good.
I immediately began receiving propagation reports and within 24 hours had
reports from 240 unique stations. The farthest was VK5ARG (17,276 km) with
a SNR of -21. Even though the window faced the west, propagation into
Europe was strong with SV9KI (7,800 km) reporting -26 SNR. The
propagation report is from http://wspr.rocks/  <http://wspr.rocks/>
I've found that WSPR is a great way to evaluate antennas. The AX-1 seems
to be performing very well.
73,
Ron Gruner
K4RHG
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to ab7e...@gmail.com
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to n...@elecraft.com
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to n7...@arrl.net
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to ab7e...@gmail.com

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com 

Reply via email to