Yes, as I understood it, the Icom rise time default is a BAD choice, but recent 
(e.g. IC7300 and others) radios permitted changing this to a better value, 
although still behind the cleaner output of Elecraft & Kenwood.

The other interesting part of the discussion was the use of “pre distortion”.  
Again I read this as a way for the exciting transmitter to compensate for 
non-linearity (and resulting dirty emissions) introduced by a modern 
semiconductor based “linear” amplifier (one place where tubes excel).

All new and interesting stuff to me - and apparently the driving force behind 
the ARRL “Clean Signal Initiative” to both define better standards, then rate 
transmitters in ARRL testing against these standards.  And of course, 
encourage/coerce manufacturers to clean up their outputs!

Steve

> On Jul 1, 2023, at 3:33 PM, Jim Brown <j...@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:
> 
> On 7/1/2023 10:34 AM, Steve L wrote:
>> The IC7300 was among the better commercial transceivers in terms of spurious 
>> emissions, clicks, splatter, etc. It wasn’t at the top of the list (the K3s 
>> is however), but was in the “better” category. However, Rob recommended a 
>> change in the CW signal rise time to no less than 6 milliseconds - I forget 
>> which menu item it was - but he criticized Icom specifically for a default 
>> setting that induced key clicks.
> 
> ICOM rigs are NOT among the cleaner ones -- that spot falls to Kenwood, which 
> is second to Elecraft (and, I suspect, Flex 6000 series, which I haven't 
> measured).
> 
> Yes, adjustable rise time is a REALLY bad idea, which K6XX pointed out in 
> 2013, and which I measured on the air for K6XX's talk, in a neighbor's ICOM 
> rig. Slower is better, but Elecraft's is best by far, carefully shaped keying 
> waveform.
> 
> 73, Jim K9YC
> 

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com 

Reply via email to