Jack - while living in Folsom (no, not the Big House!) I put up a 102 foot long 
doublet fed with 450 ohm line. Horrible stuff - fog, rain, dew - they all 
caused drastic SWR changes and my KPA500 was quite unhappy. I built some home 
brew 600 ohm line using spreaders I found online. The problem was resolved. Of 
course, had that location been where we got snowfall enough to stay on the 
line, things may have been different. 

Now I live in an HOA neighborhood and am lucky to have put up a stealthy EFW 
fed with hidden coax. I’d love to revert to 600 ohm feeder but that just isn’t 
possible! :-(

Jim / K7TXA 

> On Jul 19, 2025, at 8:31 PM, Jack Brindle via Elecraft 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Sorry, but I have to ask this. If indeed this is the case, why does it not 
> apply to open wire, where water has no effect on the line and thus there is 
> no need to retune?
> As I recall from my fields and waves class (also 50 years ago), any change to 
> the dielectric _will_ change the impedance of the line. Since it also plays 
> the role of a matching section (as you note), then the impedance at the ATU 
> will be changed by an about that we may be able to calculate given proper 
> tools like a VNA. More explanation, please...
> 
> I bought 5 spools of open wire about 50 years ago just before I left 
> Newington, and still have four full spools. Unfortunately the plastic spacers 
> have deteriorated while in storage, so
> It isn’t as good as it used to be. I plan to rebuild the line, though. I find 
> that the center plastic spool found in dog poop bags are perfect for this 
> task. It doesn’t make the task of walking the dog a lot more fun, but it 
> helps… <grin>
> 
> 73,
> Jack, W6FB
> 
>> On Jul 19, 2025, at 9:16 PM, David Gilbert via Elecraft 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> You are correct.  Water has an Er up around 80 (!!!) and it changes the 
>> velocity factor of a wire ... it doesn't have as large an effect on the 
>> impedance.  I recently did some experiments on dielectric loading of a 100 
>> MHz dipole, and the detuning effect with a water filled cylinder around just 
>> a two inch length at the end of the wire was amazingly large.
>> 
>> Dave   AB7E
>> 
>> 
>>> On 7/19/2025 6:48 PM, Bob McGraw via Elecraft wrote:
>>> In further reading this series of postings, two things come to my attention.
>>> 
>>> The G5RV incorporates a balun at the point where the coax connects to the 
>>> balanced line. That balun may be faulty as discussed about baluns heating 
>>> and the core material changing values. Hence the first half of the FT-8 QSO 
>>> was good but the ATU faulted in the latter part.
>>> 
>>> My measurements on balanced window line, such as used with the G5RV, 
>>> indicates the velocity factor changes with moisture on the line.  (Someone 
>>> stated changed impedance. I don't find this to be correct.) With a velocity 
>>> factor change, the electrical length of the line changes.  This section of 
>>> line is a matching section and thus its electrical length is very 
>>> important.  Yes if the VF changes, the electrical length changes, and it 
>>> will require to ATU to implement a change in matching component values to 
>>> resolve the desired SWR.
>>> 
>>> Candidly, I doubt there is anything wrong with the KAT500 tuners.
>>> 
>>> 73
>>> 
>>> Bob, K4TAX
>>> 
>>> P.S.  For an excellent dissertation on the G5RV antenna 
>>> see:https://www.bvarc.org/pdf/g5rv_w5rh.pdf
>>> 
>>> Here we learn the length is 102 ft. or 3/2 wavelength at 14 MHz. The center 
>>> feed Z is ~90 ohms +/- j0.  The matching section is 34 ft of OPEN WIRE line 
>>> which is 1/2 *electrical*wavelength to a 1:1 balun which is fed via *75 
>>> ohm*coax to the transmitter.
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to [email protected]
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[email protected]
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to [email protected]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected] 

Reply via email to