On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 09:19:34AM -0600, Tom Hammond wrote:
> David:
>
> >> For finding the peak, either will work, however, for finding the best
> >> Signal-to-noise ratio, the xanalyser will probably be better because
> >> it should allow you to see both the signal AND the background noise,
> >> so you can tell when he background noise is dropping faster than
> >the signal.
> >
> >That's what I thought.
> >That should be fairly easy for me to set up.
>
> The s/n ratio setting is usually only about 1/2-3/4 turn in from the
> point of max received signal. Run thru it a few times, to make sue
> you're seeing what you think you're seeing... and if you can't see
> it, try to hit the point of max. rx sig and then turn the slug in
> about 1/2 turn.
Yes, that is what I did.
Thanks.
>
> 73,
>
> Tom
>
--
David Dawson
A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many
bad measures.
-- Daniel Webster
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
