DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL wrote:
RE: Issues and Enhancements document
1. Known issues (problem list / bugs) that are either "in the works
and being resolved" or "soon to be addressed."
2. Requested enhancements ("wish list") with some sort of priority
flag (high, med, low, and "don't hold your breath")
I too would like this, but as a software developer I know why they don't
do it (at least, I know why *I* don't do it).
1) The amount of time it would take to compile such a list might not be
unreasonable. But then they have to respond to all the questions,
suggestions, and arguments that it will generate. And the 'they' is
basically Wayne, who really has more to do now than one regular human
can do.
2) Once something is listed as a future feature, many will interpret
that as a contract. If it turns out later to have been a bad idea, too
complicated, etc. then the decision to not do it will have to be justified.
Think about this in terms of the *thousands* of people who have an
interest in the K3 and you can see why it would be a heavy load.
--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
