Lennart Michaëlsson wrote: > > Also, some filters are reputed to have been defective. Of course, the > filters may not be totally to blame for the mediocre front end performance > of the K3 (compared with the professional-level performance that some of > us > had hoped for.) > I must have been asleep. Can someone point me to the reports of mediocre front end performance, please? I hadn't noticed any criticisms, apart from this one.
In the reviews of "professional" grade receivers I've seen, such as the Icom professional receiver, the performance was actually worse than many amateur transceivers, and certainly worse than the K3. I suppose Elecraft must be doing something right if people have to make things up to find something to complain about... ----- Julian, G4ILO K3 s/n: 222 K2 s/n: 392 G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com KComm for K2/K3: www.g4ilo.com/kcomm.html -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Filter-prices-tp18267317p18269182.html Sent from the [K3] mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
