David Cutter wrote:
>
> Somebody said they didn't care what the stream was, it could be dealt with
> externally, so, could we tap off the relevant signal, thro an off-board
> buffer and take it to a new socket on the back?
>
>
We don't care about the sample rate or bit depth too much, but the data
needs to be obtainable by the computer in a manageable way, such as through
an extension of the existing CAT command set. Given the choice of modifying
their K3 or just plugging something into the back, I think most people would
opt for the latter, even though it would entail an unnecessary D to A and
back to D again step.
-----
Julian, G4ILO. K2 #392 K3 #222.
http://www.g4ilo.com/ G4ILO's Shack http://www.ham-directory.com/ Ham
Directory http://www.g4ilo.com/kcomm.html KComm for Elecraft K2 and K3
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/K3-Digital-audio-out---tp838886p841150.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
