Put me down in favor of two-tap (the way it is now). Al N1AL
On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 13:32, wayne burdick wrote: > Doug, > > There was plenty of logic behind it, but in hindsight it might not > sense for all users. (It did meet with the approval of our 20 field > testers.) > > The change was motivated by the sub receiver. Here's one example: > > Suppose you're using SPLIT, listening to a weak DX station on the main > RX (in a very narrow bandwidth with preamp on), while tuning for a > clear spot with the sub RX (using a wider bandwidth and preamp off). > With one tap of A>B you can move VFO B back to the starting point and > work your way up again. If this also copied VFO A's filter and preamp > settings (etc.) to VFO B, you'd have to set them up all over again. > > But I'll be happy to sit back and listen to arguments pro and con. If > it looks like a lot of operators would prefer to copy everything with > one tap, I could add a menu entry. If no one argues in favor of two-tap > (including the field testers), I could change it outright. I'm easy :) > > Thanks for your input. > > Wayne > N6KR > > --- > > http://www.elecraft.com > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
