Rob,
  True, but, for example, I can do that on my 756Pro2 and it is often I want 
to in a contest.  For example, if I have narrowed the filter settings to 
pull out a weak one and want to go back to a normal wider setting, this is 
something to do while the computer is sending the next CQ.  Now at least we 
can clear the RIT while transmitting, which is helpful.  The Pro2 allows you 
to adjust just about any RX parameter while transmitting, and I find that 
extremely useful. I've commented on this issue since first getting my K3 in 
2007.
  73, andy, ae6y
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <k...@baymoon.com>
To: "Guy Olinger K2AV" <olin...@bellsouth.net>
Cc: <elecraft@mailman.qth.net>; "HA3AUI" <ha3...@ax.hu>
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] disabled controls during TX


> Even the FT-1000D would not let you change RX filters during XMT.
>
> Rob K6RB
>
>> I agree, the K3 certainly does have more RX things locked while
>> transmitting than my MP,  but the MP had some as well.
>>
>> I seem to recall that this is also true of other software defined
>> radios like Flex, but others can comment on that.  All of the K3
>> controls are effectively encoders, including the rf/af gain controls
>> which divide off a standard voltage and are converted to digital
>> before they are used for anything and must be processed to have
>> effect.  In a completely analog radio, each pot is always connected to
>> its own circuit.
>>
>> The shift/width/speed/cmp controls are encoders only and tell the CPU
>> when they are being turned and which direction, They can only only
>> have an effect when the CPU is paying attention to them.  There is no
>> end of pot or physical range limits on them.  They do not retain their
>> state like rf/af controls.  In order to be continuously responsive,
>> the firmware program(s) would have to be constantly running a state
>> function for each of them, even while creating the transmit envelope
>> from digitized input.  This could be disproportionately more difficult
>> code or disproportionately more use of processing resources. Using
>> encoders allows multiple functions for each knob, which would not be
>> possible with if they were pots.
>>
>> But someone from Elecraft would need to comment to the rationale of
>> freezing a given RX setting during TX and whether any unfreezing is on
>> the firmware-to-do list.
>>
>> I know they have gone through at least two phases of optimizing code
>> for resource use.
>>
>> I have to be careful myself -- I tend to be irritated by anything that
>> is different, and there is a LOT in a K3 different from an analog
>> radio.  So far none of them are deal breakers, and me getting used to
>> them has been the real issue.  I was still fussing a year later about
>> my new FT1000MP.  But when it was all over, were it not for fixing the
>> key clicks, the quite crushable front end, and all the IM crap it
>> added to the ambient band noise, it would still be my favorite, just
>> because matched INRAD 8 pole filters in both IF's for all modes and
>> bandwidths really worked well for selectivity AND I was finally used
>> to the menus and knobs and rarely had to look anything up in the
>> manual.  My new rig angst isn't particular to the K3, it's just me.
>> It's new anything angst.
>>
>> I hate changes, I hate surprises, yada, yada, but that's my problem.
>> Were it not for four years non-contest operating with a K2, the K3
>> analog-to-digital-disconnect change together with panel changes may
>> have been a deal breaker with where-the-h*ll-are-the-band-buttons,
>> etc. But I had already figured out I could hear way better on any band
>> with my K2 than the MP, and my brain's anti-change barking dog was
>> regularly whipped back into the corner for the privilege of hearing
>> the EU 40m QRP-basement-noodle-antenna crowd on my K3, and realizing
>> that the next layer was an apparently inexhaustible layer of Russians
>> that points to some *RX* antenna work to get them.  So now I'm getting
>> used to the K3, .....
>>
>> Going to N1MM logger from the DOS-based TR logger was quite more
>> irritating than any switching receivers. I was thrown in the deep end
>> of the pool, do or die, at a multi-op station with all those other ops
>> around me that switched years ago and were very helpful, but couldn't
>> quite keep the smirk off their face....
>>
>> 73, Guy.
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 6:07 AM, HA3AUI <ha3...@ax.hu> wrote:
>>> I wonder if anyone else has noticed, most of the front panel controls
>>> are disabled during TX?
>>> It's quite annoying during a contest for example, where you could use
>>> that little time to make an adjustment eg. change bandwidth, turn on/off
>>> preamp etc. before the rig returns to RX.
>>> I've never ever seen this behavior on any other rig that I own.
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>>
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to