Something I never understood is QSK, ohh well that´s life! Jim SM2EKM --------------- On 2010-05-15 17:26, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote: > Honestly, that is the first time I have heard that. Obviously did not > see the memo. Back to "OLD QSK". Hurray. > > Need to spend time doing more random word searches in the manual. > > 73, Guy. > > On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:16 AM, John, KD8K<j...@kd8k.com> wrote: >> I am not sure if this has been mentioned yet, but another setting that >> may have an affect on this is switching between "New" QSK and "OLD" QSK >> by tapping 3 under the CW WGHT Menu Item. I think that the default is >> "New". I believe "Old" is supposed to provide better QSK performance >> while "New" reduces keying artifacts. >> >> 73, >> >> John >> >> Toby Pennington wrote: >>> A friend of mine and I experiminted to see if the K3 could hear a bk during >>> a transmission at high speeds >>> >>> He was using the K3 with a pre BETA version, and I was on a Icom 7700. >>> He would send a macro at a high speed, and I would try to break him using >>> two letters (ie). Almost always he could hear my first break attempt. We >>> went up to 75 wpm and he could still hear my bk. >>> >>> So, we are wondering about what is going on concerning this thread. Now, >>> it is possible my friend is hearing between words, but the bk could be >>> heard almost 100%. >>> >>> My friend says the delay should be set to double zero on the K3 for it to >>> work???? >>> >>> Toby W4CAK ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
