[EM] (no subject)

[Dgamble997]

Eric Gorr wrote:

I don't understand what your problem is with electing candidates who
are the most preferred by the majority of people. Isn't that the
point of single-winner elections?

Or is your real problem with single-winner elections as you would
rather see everything move to PR?


The answer to this question is yes. The more I look at single winner methods the more flaws I find with all of them. I would probably now describe IRV as the least worst single seat method as opposed to the best.

David Gamble