election-methods-electorama.com  

Messages by Date

• 2005/10/11 RE: [EM] Re: Why it doesn't matter if "prefer" means anything Paul Kislanko
• 2005/10/11 [EM] Re: Why it doesn't matter if "prefer" means anything MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/10/11 RE: [EM] Re: A more briefly-defined method with the best mix of properties Kevin Venzke
• 2005/10/11 RE: [EM] MDDA: prefer deluxe, evaluate properties Kevin Venzke
• 2005/10/11 RE: Why truncation resistance is important (RE: [EM] Re: Rob: MDDA vsBeatpathWinner) Paul Kislanko
• 2005/10/11 [EM] Re: A more briefly-defined method with the best mix of properties Araucaria Araucana
• 2005/10/11 [EM] Does MDDA really satisfy FBC? Warren Smith
• 2005/10/11 [EM] more re Deluxe MDDA Warren Smith
• 2005/10/11 [EM] MDDA: prefer deluxe, evaluate properties Warren Smith
• 2005/10/11 Re: [EM] Why it doesn't matter if prefer means anything Jobst Heitzig
• 2005/10/11 [EM] STV with which quota? stephane.rouillon
• 2005/10/10 [EM] Why it doesn't matter if prefer means anything MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/10/10 [EM] A precise abstract definition of "prefer" MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/10/10 [EM] Power Truncation MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/10/10 [EM] Statue language for MDDA MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/10/10 [EM] Deluxe MDDA MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/10/10 [EM] A more briefly-defined method with the best mix of properties MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/10/09 RE: Why truncation resistance is important (RE: [EM] Re: Rob: MDDA vsBeatpathWinner) James Gilmour
• 2005/10/09 Re: Why truncation resistance is important (RE: [EM] Re: Rob: MDDA vs BeatpathWinner) Dave Ketchum
• 2005/10/09 Re: [EM] How does one write to or join the Toby Nixon Condorcet mailing list? Jan Kok
• 2005/10/09 Why truncation resistance is important (RE: [EM] Re: Rob: MDDA vs BeatpathWinner) Rob Lanphier
• 2005/10/08 Re: [EM] Re: Rob: MDDA vs BeatpathWinner Dave Ketchum
• 2005/10/08 [EM] How does one write to or join the Toby Nixon Condorcet mailing list? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/10/08 RE: [EM] Re: Rob: MDDA vs BeatpathWinner Paul Kislanko
• 2005/10/08 [EM] Re: Rob: MDDA vs BeatpathWinner MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/10/07 [EM] Ken's SFC objections, contd. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/10/07 Re: [EM] Rob: MDDA vs BeatpathWinner Rob Lanphier
• 2005/10/07 [EM] Rob: MDDA vs BeatpathWinner MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/10/07 [EM] Why SFC is better than Condorcet's Criterion MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/10/07 Re: [EM] Reply to SFC objection Ken Kuhlman
• 2005/10/06 [EM] Reply to SFC objection MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/10/06 Re: [EM] Alternative SFC wording Rob Lanphier
• 2005/10/06 Re: [EM] Alternative SFC wording Ken Kuhlman
• 2005/10/06 [EM] which voting methods fail WMW? Chris Benham
• 2005/10/06 Re: [EM] sincerity in range votes / and fantasies Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2005/10/06 Re: [EM] sincerity in range votes / and fantasies Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2005/10/06 Re: [EM] Rob: Condorcet's Criterion vs FBC. Will people favorite-bury? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2005/10/06 [EM] 2 questions on unanimity Stephen Turner
• 2005/10/05 [EM] MDDA MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/10/05 [EM] O/D MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/10/05 [EM] Alternative SFC wording MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/10/05 RE: [EM] Offense/Defense, an FBC compliant method between MMPO and Approval Paul Kislanko
• 2005/10/05 [EM] Offense/Defense, an FBC compliant method between MMPO and Approval Simmons, Forest
• 2005/10/05 Re: [EM] majority winner and range & condorcet methods Jobst Heitzig
• 2005/10/05 [EM] which voting methods fail WMW? Warren Smith
• 2005/10/05 [EM] majority winner and range & condorcet methods Chris Benham
• 2005/10/05 RE: [EM] Rob: Condorcet's Criterion vs FBC. Will people favorite-bury? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2005/10/04 [EM] Majority criteria MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/10/04 [EM] Rob: SFC and your 2nd statement MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/10/04 [EM] majority winner and range & condorcet methods Warren Smith
• 2005/10/04 [EM] majority criterion Warren Smith
• 2005/10/04 Re: [EM] sincerity in range votes / and fantasies Rob Lanphier
• 2005/10/04 [EM] sincerity in range votes / and fantasies Warren Smith
• 2005/10/04 [EM] range voting "passing constitutional muster" / Range's "glaring defect" Warren Smith
• 2005/10/03 Fixing the SFC definition on Electowiki (Re: [EM] Rob reply: FBC vs CC. SFC. RV.,) Rob Lanphier
• 2005/10/03 Re: [EM] Rob: Condorcet's Criterion vs FBC. Will people favorite-bury? Rob Lanphier
• 2005/10/03 Re: [EM] range "killing" example and those ignorably-rare burying voters... are you on drugs? Yves Dandurand
• 2005/10/03 RE: [EM] Rob: Condorcet's Criterion vs FBC. Will people favorite-bury? Paul Kislanko
• 2005/10/03 Re: [EM] Rob: Condorcet's Criterion vs FBC. Will people favorite-bury? Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/10/03 RE: [EM] Rob reply: FBC vs CC. SFC. RV., Paul Kislanko
• 2005/10/03 [EM] Rob reply: FBC vs CC. SFC. RV., MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/10/03 [EM] range "killing" example and those ignorably-rare burying voters... are you on drugs? Warren Smith
• 2005/10/03 Re: [EM] Rob: Condorcet's Criterion vs FBC. Will people favorite-bury? Rob Lanphier
• 2005/10/02 [EM] Deluxe MDDA MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/10/02 [EM] Rob: Condorcet's Criterion vs FBC. Will people favorite-bury? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/10/01 RE: [EM] Re: worldwide survey on democracy (Abd ul-Rahman Lomax) Steve Barney
• 2005/10/01 Re: [EM] RE: improved approval? Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/10/01 RE: [EM] Re: worldwide survey on democracy (Abd ul-Rahman Lomax) Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/10/01 RE: [EM] RE: [Condorcet] A "Condorcet" by any other name stillsmells as sweet? Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/09/30 RE: [EM] RE: [Condorcet] A "Condorcet" by any other name stillsmells as sweet? Paul Kislanko
• 2005/09/30 Re: [EM] RE: [Condorcet] A "Condorcet" by any other name still smells as sweet? Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/09/30 RE: [EM] Re: worldwide survey on democracy (Abd ul-Rahman Lomax) Paul Kislanko
• 2005/09/30 RE: [EM] Gradual Information Approval Kevin Venzke
• 2005/09/30 RE: [EM] Re: worldwide survey on democracy (Abd ul-Rahman Lomax) Steve Barney
• 2005/09/30 RE: [EM] Gradual Information Approval Paul Kislanko
• 2005/09/30 [EM] Gradual Information Approval Simmons, Forest
• 2005/09/30 RE: [EM] FW: [Condorcet] Re: why the Schulze Method is a Better Proposal Paul Kislanko
• 2005/09/30 [EM] FW: [Condorcet] Re: why the Schulze Method is a Better Proposal Simmons, Forest
• 2005/09/30 [EM] RE: [Condorcet] A "Condorcet" by any other name still smells as sweet? Simmons, Forest
• 2005/09/30 RE: [EM] Re: worldwide survey on democracy (Abd ul-Rahman Lomax) Paul Kislanko
• 2005/09/30 RE: [EM] Re: worldwide survey on democracy (Abd ul-Rahman Lomax) Steve Barney
• 2005/09/30 RE: [EM] Re: worldwide survey on democracy (Abd ul-Rahman Lomax) Paul Kislanko
• 2005/09/30 [EM] Re: worldwide survey on democracy (Abd ul-Rahman Lomax) Steve Barney
• 2005/09/29 Re: [EM] worldwide survey on democracy Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2005/09/29 [EM] worldwide survey on democracy Stephen Turner
• 2005/09/28 [EM] Andrew Gumbel: "Steal this Vote: Dirty Elections and the Rotten History of Democracy in America". Chris Benham
• 2005/09/28 Re: [EM] RE: improved approval? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2005/09/27 [EM] RE: improved approval? Simmons, Forest
• 2005/09/27 RE: [EM] Re: Bucklin Paul Kislanko
• 2005/09/27 [EM] Re: Bucklin Gervase Lam
• 2005/09/27 RE: [EM] RE: [Condorcet] Re: why the Schulze Method is a Better Proposal Paul Kislanko
• 2005/09/27 [EM] RE: a better Bucklin flavored FBC satisfying method Simmons, Forest
• 2005/09/27 [EM] Improved Approval? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2005/09/27 [EM] RE: [Condorcet] Re: why the Schulze Method is a Better Proposal Simmons, Forest
• 2005/09/26 [EM] Anthony reply MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/09/26 [EM] RE: Bucklin Paul Kislanko
• 2005/09/25 [EM] Running Green PenobscotGreen
• 2005/09/24 [EM] ERBucklin(whole) typo MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/09/24 RE: [EM] A better Bucklin flavored FBC satisfying method Kevin Venzke
• 2005/09/24 RE: [EM] A better Bucklin flavored FBC satisfying method Paul Kislanko
• 2005/09/24 [EM] RE: Bucklin Simmons, Forest
• 2005/09/24 [EM] A better Bucklin flavored FBC satisfying method Simmons, Forest
• 2005/09/24 RE: [EM] RE: Better-worded definition of ERBucklin(whole) Paul Kislanko
• 2005/09/24 [EM] RE: Better-worded definition of ERBucklin(whole) Simmons, Forest
• 2005/09/24 RE: [EM] Better-worded definition of ERBucklin(whole) Paul Kislanko
• 2005/09/24 Re: [EM] Better-worded definition of ERBucklin(whole) Adam Tarr
• 2005/09/23 [EM] Better-worded definition of ERBucklin(whole) MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/09/23 RE: [EM] RE: Bucklin Kevin Venzke
• 2005/09/23 [EM] RE: Bucklin Simmons, Forest
• 2005/09/22 [EM] Re: Bucklin MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/09/22 [EM] An interesting example Simmons, Forest
• 2005/09/22 Re: [EM] DMC Kevin Venzke
• 2005/09/22 RE: [EM] Bucklin Kevin Venzke
• 2005/09/21 [EM] MCA MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/09/21 RE: [EM] RE: Election-methods Digest, Vol 15, Issue 37 Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/09/21 [EM] Bucklin MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/09/21 [EM] Jobst: SFC MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/09/21 [EM] ? about SR Paul Kislanko
• 2005/09/21 [EM] DMC & majority defensive strategy criteria MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/09/21 Re: [EM] DMC Jobst Heitzig
• 2005/09/21 RE: [EM] FW: ? about SR Paul Kislanko
• 2005/09/21 RE: [EM] Mike's suggestions for Public Proposals Kevin Venzke
• 2005/09/21 RE: [EM] FW: ? about SR Kevin Venzke
• 2005/09/21 RE: [EM] RE: Election-methods Digest, Vol 15, Issue 37 Kevin Venzke
• 2005/09/21 Re: [EM] DMC Kevin Venzke
• 2005/09/21 [EM] FW: ? about SR Paul Kislanko
• 2005/09/21 [EM] RE: Election-methods Digest, Vol 15, Issue 37 Simmons, Forest
• 2005/09/21 [EM] Mike's suggestions for Public Proposals Simmons, Forest
• 2005/09/21 RE: [EM] RE: Election-methods Digest, Vol 15, Issue 37 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2005/09/21 Re: [EM] DMC Kevin Venzke
• 2005/09/20 Re: [EM] DMC Jobst Heitzig
• 2005/09/20 [EM] Re: Summed Ranks (SR) Rob LeGrand
• 2005/09/20 RE: [EM] RE: Election-methods Digest, Vol 15, Issue 37 Kevin Venzke
• 2005/09/20 RE: [EM] Re: Summed Ranks (SR) Kevin Venzke
• 2005/09/20 [EM] Re: Summed Ranks (SR) Rob LeGrand
• 2005/09/20 [EM] DMC MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/09/20 Re: [EM] Re: SR Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/09/19 [EM] SR, Borda MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/09/19 [EM] Re: SR MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/09/19 [EM] Election Methods, Condorcet List, and Gatekeepers Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/09/19 Re: [EM] RE: Election-methods Digest, Vol 15, Issue 37 Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/09/19 [EM] RE: moral basis for approval Simmons, Forest
• 2005/09/19 [EM] RE: SR Simmons, Forest
• 2005/09/19 [EM] RE: Definition of Sincere Approval voting Simmons, Forest
• 2005/09/19 [EM] RE: Election-methods Digest, Vol 15, Issue 37 Simmons, Forest
• 2005/09/19 [EM] RE: [Condorcet] Favorite Betrayal in DMC Simmons, Forest
• 2005/09/19 Re: [EM] Moral basis for "Approval" Dave Ketchum
• 2005/09/19 Re: [RangeVoting] Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet's strategy problem Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/09/19 [EM] Definition of "sincere approval voting" (was FBC comparison: WV, margins, MMPO, DMC) Chris Benham
• 2005/09/19 Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet's strategy problem Jan Kok
• 2005/09/18 Re: [EM] Moral basis for "Approval" Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/09/18 Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet's strategy problem Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/09/18 Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet's strategy problem, ICA Kevin Venzke
• 2005/09/18 RE: [EM] Summed Ranks (SR) Kevin Venzke
• 2005/09/18 [EM] Moral standing of Approval? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/09/18 Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet's strategy problem, ICA Rob Lanphier
• 2005/09/18 [EM] Thanks for the answers about DMC MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/09/18 [EM] SR2 MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/09/18 [EM] SR2 MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/09/18 [EM] MDDSR MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/09/18 [EM] Summed Ranks (SR) MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/09/18 [EM] where to email your HAVA comments Warren Smith
• 2005/09/18 [EM] Action Request about Help America Vote ActTo Electorama Warren Smith
• 2005/09/18 Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet's strategy problem, ICA Kevin Venzke
• 2005/09/18 [EM] Some observations from today's German elections Jobst Heitzig
• 2005/09/18 RE: [EM] Definition of "sincere approval voting" (was FBC comparison: WV, margins, MMPO, DMC) Kevin Venzke
• 2005/09/18 [EM] Definition of "sincere approval voting" (was FBC comparison: WV, margins, MMPO, DMC) Chris Benham
• 2005/09/18 Re: [EM] Any chance someone could post a definitiion of DMC? Rob Lanphier
• 2005/09/17 [EM] Moral basis for "Approval" Rob Lanphier
• 2005/09/17 Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet's strategy problem, ICA Rob Lanphier
• 2005/09/17 [EM] Any chance someone could post a definitiion of DMC? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/09/17 [EM] Earliest proposals of Mutual Majority Criterion that I'm aware of MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/09/17 Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet's strategy problem, ICA Kevin Venzke
• 2005/09/17 RE: [EM] Approval versus Ranked methods Kevin Venzke
• 2005/09/17 [EM] Approval versus Ranked methods Simmons, Forest
• 2005/09/17 Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet's strategy problem Rob Lanphier
• 2005/09/17 [EM] Favorite Betrayal in DMC Simmons, Forest
• 2005/09/17 Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet's strategy problem Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/09/17 Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet's strategy problem Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/09/16 [EM] Re: Condorcet's strategy problem MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/09/16 [EM] RE: [Condorcet] Re: Voting as duty (was ties & truncation) Simmons, Forest
• 2005/09/16 [EM] RE: Improved Condorcet Approval (ICA) Simmons, Forest
• 2005/09/16 [EM] Re: DMC strategy (correction) Simmons, Forest
• 2005/09/16 [EM] DMC strategy Simmons, Forest
• 2005/09/15 Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet's strategy problem Rob Lanphier
• 2005/09/15 Re: [EM] Voting as duty (was ties & truncation) Dave Ketchum
• 2005/09/15 Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet's strategy problem Dave Ketchum
• 2005/09/15 [EM] A few brief replies MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/09/15 [EM] Re: Condorcet's strategy problem MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/09/15 Re: [EM] Rob: Condorcet's strategy problem Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/09/15 Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet's strategy problem Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/09/15 Re: [EM] Voting as duty (was ties & truncation) Abd ulRahman Lomax
• 2005/09/14 Re: [EM] Rob: Condorcet's strategy problem Rob Lanphier
• 2005/09/14 RE: [EM] Improved Condorcet Approval (ICA) Kevin Venzke
• 2005/09/14 [EM] Rob: Condorcet's strategy problem MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/09/14 [EM] Re: Condorcet's strategy problem MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2005/09/14 [EM] RE: Simple English Simmons, Forest
• 2005/09/14 Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet's strategy problem eric
• 2005/09/14 [EM] RE: ICA (correction) Simmons, Forest
• 2005/09/14 [EM] RE: [Condorcet] Plain English description of Schulze(wv) Simmons, Forest

• Earlier messages