> Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 18:23:28 +0200 (CEST) > From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Kevin=20Venzke?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [EM] lower preferences
> Donald wants high-utility candidates (at least, high-utility for SOME > group). I would recommend Approval, but Donald seems worried that voters > will not be smart enough to properly place approval cutoffs. During the thread about how Condorcet can choose a "turkey" candidate (I think), there were quite a few people who posted how they would rank all of the various election methods. However, Donald gave a set of Cardinal Ratings for the election methods instead. First came IRV, which got a 10. Second came Approval, which got an 8. Thanks, Gervase. ---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
