Matt said (referring to Eric's count program):


I tried
4:A>C>B
10:A>B>C
6:B>A>C
8:B>C>A
6:C>B>A
9:C>A>B

which translates to
24:B>C 23:C>A 23:A>B

My PERL script computes this as a win for B. You compute it as tie for A & B.

I reply:

Based on the numbers that Matt gave, it's a tie between A & B. In fact, a 3-candidate example doesn't even require a computer to determine the winner.

Perhaps Matt should hire someone who is able to code perl.

With 3 candidates, MAM (aka RP), SSD, CSSD, & PC all give the same outcome: The winner is the candidate whose defeat is the least.

Mike Ossipoff

_________________________________________________________________
Check out the new MSN 9 Dial-up � fast & reliable Internet access with prime features! http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=dialup/home&ST=1


----
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to