Messages by Date
-
2005/01/22
[EM] Amendment and Succesive
Cruz VIcente Omar de la
-
2005/01/22
Re: [EM] Comments on Approval posting
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/01/22
[EM] Clock Methods (for Three Candidates)
Forest Simmons
-
2005/01/22
[EM] Comments on Approval posting
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/22
[EM] Suggestions for choice of Best Frontrunner versions
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/21
Re: [EM] How Approval locks onto the CW in two or three moves
Forest Simmons
-
2005/01/20
[EM] How Approval locks onto the CW in two or three moves
Russ Paielli
-
2005/01/20
[EM] Typo
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/20
[EM] This is not a continuation of an arguemnt or debate
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/20
[EM] Expected Utility Differences strategy
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/20
[EM] The other strategies give the Acceptable/Unacceptable strategy
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/20
[EM] Re: Sprucing up vs. Condorcet Lottery vs. immunity: The "twisted prism" example
Ted Stern
-
2005/01/20
Re: [EM] Another Grand Compromise
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/01/20
[EM] Re: Approval scenarios, part 1
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/20
[EM] Re: Sprucing up vs. Condorcet Lottery vs. immunity: The "twisted prism" example
Ted Stern
-
2005/01/20
Re: [EM] Re: approval strategy (Russ Paielli)
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/01/20
RE: [EM] Re: Counting Time
Forest Simmons
-
2005/01/20
RE: [EM] Re: Counting Time
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/01/20
RE: [EM] Re: Counting Time
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/01/20
[EM] Re: Counting Time
Forest Simmons
-
2005/01/20
[EM] Another Grand Compromise
Forest Simmons
-
2005/01/20
Re: [EM] How Approval locks on to the CW in two or three moves.
Forest Simmons
-
2005/01/20
Re: [EM] Re: Approval/Condorcet Hybrids
Forest Simmons
-
2005/01/20
[EM] Re: approval strategy (Russ Paielli)
RLSuter
-
2005/01/20
Re: [EM] approval strategy
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/01/20
Re: [EM] How Approval locks on to the CW in two or three moves.
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/01/19
Re: [EM] Re: Approval/Condorcet Hybrids
Ted Stern
-
2005/01/19
[EM] How Approval locks on to the CW in two or three moves.
Forest Simmons
-
2005/01/19
Re: [EM] Another method idea
Forest Simmons
-
2005/01/19
Source of claim that imagination is wanted (was Re: [EM] James: Approval & voter median
Craig Carey
-
2005/01/19
[EM] James: Approval & voter median
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/18
Re: [EM] Very brief Russ reply
Russ Paielli
-
2005/01/18
Re: [EM] approval strategy
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/01/18
Re: [EM] approval strategy
Russ Paielli
-
2005/01/18
Re: [EM] approval scenarios, part 1
Bart Ingles
-
2005/01/18
Re: [EM] Another method idea
Daniel Bishop
-
2005/01/18
[EM] Improving Approval Strategy posting
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/18
Re: [EM] The truth about Instant Runoff Voting
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/01/18
[EM] Re: Approval Strategy
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/18
Re: [EM] Re: approval strategy (Russ Paielli)
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/01/18
[EM] Approval Strategy
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/18
[EM] The Smith set
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/18
[EM] The ambiguously reworded definitions
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/18
[EM] Another method idea
Forest Simmons
-
2005/01/18
Re: [EM] approval scenarios, part 1
Forest Simmons
-
2005/01/18
[EM] Re: approval strategy (Russ Paielli)
RLSuter
-
2005/01/18
[EM] approval scenarios, part 1
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/01/18
Re: [EM] monotonicity and summability criteria
Daniel Bishop
-
2005/01/17
Re: [EM] monotonicity and summability criteria
Russ Paielli
-
2005/01/17
Re: [EM] monotonicity and summability criteria
Daniel Bishop
-
2005/01/17
[EM] monotonicity and summability criteria
Russ Paielli
-
2005/01/17
Re: [EM] "Majority Opposition" criterion
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/01/17
[EM] Re: approval strategy (Russ Paielli)
Alex Small
-
2005/01/17
Re: [EM] approval defection; another easy method
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/01/17
Re: [EM] approval strategy
Russ Paielli
-
2005/01/17
Re: [EM] approval strategy
Forest Simmons
-
2005/01/17
Re: [EM] Very brief Russ reply
Russ Paielli
-
2005/01/17
[EM] Re: electionmethods website is cancelled]
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/01/17
[EM] Caveats for people working on alternative election methods
Alex Small
-
2005/01/17
RE: [EM] Very brief Russ reply
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/01/17
[EM] Very brief Russ reply
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/17
Re: [EM] electionmethods.org idea?
Bjarke Dahl Ebert
-
2005/01/17
Re: [EM] Russ's overlong, off-topic poting
Russ Paielli
-
2005/01/17
Re: [EM] electionmethods.org idea?
Eric Gorr
-
2005/01/17
[EM] electionmethods.org idea?
Dan Keshet
-
2005/01/17
[EM] Smith set
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/17
[EM] Information needed to apply WDSC & SDSC
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/17
[EM] Russ's overlong, off-topic poting
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/16
Re: [EM] approval strategy
Anthony Duff
-
2005/01/16
Re: [EM] approval strategy
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/01/16
[EM] approval strategy
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/01/16
Re: [EM] Logic/Jargon question
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/01/16
Re: [EM] Re: majority rule criteria--alternative nomenclature
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/01/16
Re: [EM] Logic/Jargon question
Daniel Bishop
-
2005/01/16
[EM] Logic/Jargon question
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/01/16
RE: [EM] Re: majority rule criteria--alternative nomenclature
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/01/16
Re: [EM] Re: majority rule criteria--alternative nomenclature
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/01/16
[EM] Re: Re: electionsmethods website is cancelled
Forest Simmons
-
2005/01/16
Re: [EM] Re: electionmethods website is cancelled
Russ Paielli
-
2005/01/16
Re: [EM] Re: electionmethods website is cancelled
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/01/16
Re: [EM] Re: electionmethods website is cancelled
Bart Ingles
-
2005/01/16
Re: [EM] Re: electionmethods website is cancelled
Brian Olson
-
2005/01/16
[EM] Practicality of ranked ballot methods
Andrew Myers
-
2005/01/16
Re: [EM] Re: electionmethods website is cancelled
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/01/15
Re: [EM] Re: electionmethods website is cancelled
Bart Ingles
-
2005/01/15
Re: [EM] Re: electionmethods website is cancelled
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/01/15
[EM] Re: majority rule criteria--alternative nomenclature
RLSuter
-
2005/01/15
[EM] Re: electionmethods website is cancelled
Russ Paielli
-
2005/01/14
[EM] Why Three Candidate Methods Are So Important
Forest Simmons
-
2005/01/14
Re: [EM] James: counting time
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/01/14
[EM] James: counting time
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/14
RE: [EM] justified criticism, higher/lower
James Gilmour
-
2005/01/13
Re: [EM] justified criticism, higher/lower
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/01/13
Re: [EM] Any up for a reply to an IRV advocate in Washington State?
Bart Ingles
-
2005/01/13
[EM] justified criticism, higher/lower
Anthony Duff
-
2005/01/13
Wrong information at Green-Armytage webpage (Re: [EM] Re: majority rule criteria--alternative nomenclature
Craig Carey
-
2005/01/13
Re: [EM] Re: majority rule criteria--alternative nomenclature
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/01/13
[EM] Re: majority rule criteria--alternative nomenclature
RLSuter
-
2005/01/12
Re: [EM] Order of succession in voting methods
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/01/12
[EM] Order of succession in voting methods
Michael A. Rouse
-
2005/01/12
Re: [EM] Plurality-order principle
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/01/12
[EM] Plurality-order principle
Tom Ruen
-
2005/01/12
[EM] What's the minimal covering set?
Ted Stern
-
2005/01/12
[EM] Re: James--Your classification & naming
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/11
Re: [EM] electionmethods website is cancelled
Craig Carey
-
2005/01/11
[EM] Re: majority rule criteria--alternative nomenclature
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/01/11
Re: [EM] James: Your majority-rule classifying & naming
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/01/11
[EM] electionmethods website is cancelled
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/11
[EM] James: Your majority-rule classifying & naming
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/11
Re: [EM] majority rule criteria
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/01/11
[EM] Re: Approval/Condorcet Hybrids
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/01/11
[EM] Re: Approval/Condorcet Hybrids
Ted Stern
-
2005/01/11
[EM] STV Quotas
Greg Dennis
-
2005/01/11
[EM] Re: majority rule criteria--alternative nomenclature
RLSuter
-
2005/01/11
[EM] Interesting article on proxy voting
Michael A. Rouse
-
2005/01/11
[EM] EML's failure to understand 2 candidate maths
Craig Carey
-
2005/01/10
[EM] majority rule criteria--alternative nomenclature
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/01/10
Re: [EM] majority rule criteria
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/01/10
[EM] Re: approval strategy
Forest Simmons
-
2005/01/10
Re: [EM] Re: Chris--Your Range-Voting comments
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/01/10
Re: [EM] Deterministic Districting
Toplak Jurij
-
2005/01/10
[EM] Any up for a reply to an IRV advocate in Washington State?
Ted Stern
-
2005/01/10
[EM] Re: Deterministic Districting
Ted Stern
-
2005/01/10
re: [EM] majority rule criteria
RLSuter
-
2005/01/09
[EM] majority rule criteria and you
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/01/09
[EM] majority rule criteria
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/01/09
[EM] Re: redistricting - objectively
Dr . Ernie Prabhakar
-
2005/01/09
[EM] Re: To Chris, about Range Voting
RLSuter
-
2005/01/09
[EM] Re: Chris--Your Range-Voting comments
Chris Benham
-
2005/01/09
Re: [EM] Who can't solve 2 candidate elections
Markus Schulze
-
2005/01/08
[EM] Reply to first part of Chris's CR comments
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/08
[EM] Re: To Chris, about Range-Voting
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/08
[EM] Re: Chris--Your Range-Voting comments
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/08
Re: [EM] Re: To Chris, about Range Voting
Bart Ingles
-
2005/01/08
[EM] Re: redistricting - objectively
Dr . Ernie Prabhakar
-
2005/01/08
[EM] Re: To Chris, about Range Voting
Chris Benham
-
2005/01/08
[EM] Question/Strategic Approval Voting
Michael A. Rouse
-
2005/01/08
[EM] Re: redistricting
Andrew Myers
-
2005/01/08
Re: [EM] Who can't solve 2 candidate elections
Markus Schulze
-
2005/01/08
[EM] Re: To Chris, about Range Voting
Chris Benham
-
2005/01/08
[EM] Election Certification
Ken Johnson
-
2005/01/07
[EM] To Chris, about Range Voting
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/07
Re: [EM] redistricting
bql
-
2005/01/07
[EM] redistricting
Forest Simmons
-
2005/01/07
[EM] Re: Deterministic Districting
RLSuter
-
2005/01/07
[EM] Re: Range Voting
Forest Simmons
-
2005/01/07
Re: [EM] Deterministic Districting
bql
-
2005/01/07
Re: [EM] Re: Deterministic Districting
Dr. Ernie Prabhakar
-
2005/01/07
Re: [EM] Deterministic Districting
Mike
-
2005/01/07
[EM] Re: Deterministic Districting
Ted Stern
-
2005/01/07
Re: [EM] AV strategy is hard and that's good
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/01/07
[EM] Deterministic Districting
Dr . Ernie Prabhakar
-
2005/01/07
[EM] AV strategy is hard and that's good
RLSuter
-
2005/01/07
Re: [EM] my 2¢ on range voting (and other pseudomajority methods)
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/01/07
Re: [EM] Thanks to a couple of list members (Condorcet/Range completion method)
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/01/07
[EM] Thanks to a couple of list members (Condorcet/Range completion method)
Mike
-
2005/01/07
[EM] Re: James: Your Range-Voting comments
Chris Benham
-
2005/01/07
Re: [EM] Who can't solve 2 candidate elections
Markus Schulze
-
2005/01/07
[EM] Condorcet/Range voting?
Mike
-
2005/01/07
Re: [EM] Re: twisted prism, etc.
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/01/07
Re: [EM] my 2¢ on range voting (and other pseudomajority methods)
Brian Olson
-
2005/01/06
[EM] Re: twisted prism, etc.
Forest Simmons
-
2005/01/06
[EM] Re: There is always a Condorcet Winner! (among all lotteries of candidates :-)
Ted Stern
-
2005/01/06
[EM] Re: There is always a Condorcet Winner! (among all lotteriesof candidates :-)
Ted Stern
-
2005/01/06
RE: [EM] Re: There is always a Condorcet Winner! (among all lotteriesof candidates :-)
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/01/06
Re: [EM] There is always a Condorcet Winner! (among all lotteries of candidates :-)
Markus Schulze
-
2005/01/06
[EM] Re: There is always a Condorcet Winner! (among all lotteries of candidates :-)
Ted Stern
-
2005/01/06
Re: [EM] There is always a Condorcet Winner! (among all lotteries of candidates :-)
Markus Schulze
-
2005/01/06
[EM] Re: Sprucing up vs. Condorcet Lottery vs. immunity: The "twisted prism" example
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/01/06
[EM] Sprucing up vs. Condorcet Lottery vs. immunity: The "twisted prism" example
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/01/05
[EM] Secondary list moderator
Rob Lanphier
-
2005/01/05
[EM] Re: Suter on Election-methods Digest, Vol 6, Issue 13
Warren D. Smith
-
2005/01/05
[EM] Re: lotteries
Forest Simmons
-
2005/01/05
Re: [EM] There is always a Condorcet Winner! (among all lotteries of candidates :
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/01/05
[EM] Re: lotteries
Ted Stern
-
2005/01/05
[EM] Re: lotteries
Forest Simmons
-
2005/01/05
[EM] Voter instructions for Approval & Range Voting
RLSuter
-
2005/01/05
[EM] why is covered vs. uncovered important?
Ted Stern
-
2005/01/05
[EM] There is always a Condorcet Winner! (among all lotteries of candidates :-)
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/01/05
[EM] James: Your Range-Voting comments
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/05
[EM] When sincere Approval is optimal
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/04
[EM] my 2¢ on range voting (and other pseudomajority methods)
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/01/04
Re: [EM] Re: Is range voting the panacea we need?
Bart Ingles
-
2005/01/04
[EM] R Suter's commentary on IRV
Forest Simmons
-
2005/01/04
[EM] Comparison summary
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/04
Re: [EM] Corrected commentary re IRV
Eric Gorr
-
2005/01/04
[EM] Corrected commentary re IRV
RLSuter
-
2005/01/04
[EM] Re: Random thought on Range Voting
Rob LeGrand
-
2005/01/04
[EM] Re: Chris, Range-Voting
Chris Benham
-
2005/01/04
[EM] The challenge: reasoning from Berlin solving 2 candidate elections
Craig Carey
-
2005/01/03
Re: [EM] May's Theorem did not use words "Strictly prefer"
Craig Carey
-
2005/01/03
[EM] The truth about Instant Runoff Voting
RLSuter
-
2005/01/03
Re: [EM] Random thought on Range Voting
Alex Small
-
2005/01/03
Re: [EM] Random thought on Range Voting
Brian Olson
-
2005/01/03
Re: [EM] Range-Voting article--basically right, but a few disagreements
Brian Olson
-
2005/01/03
[EM] Random thought on Range Voting
Rob LeGrand
-
2005/01/03
[EM] May's Theorem
Markus Schulze
-
2005/01/03
[EM] Range-Voting article--basically right, but a few disagreements
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/01/03
Re: [EM] Did Mr May bungle 2 candidate SNTV election maths to hide the fact of 5 papers?
Craig Carey
-
2005/01/03
[EM] Re: Is range voting the panacea we need?
Chris Benham