Marcus,
I wasn't thinking of your paper when I made that post as is hopefully evident from my reply to Mike. I (subjectively) find your paper objective. I also notice that you mention a criterion (participation) that Schulze, Swartz Sequential Dropping, Beatpath, call it what you will, fails and give a demonstration of how it can fail it.
David Gamble
- RE: [EM] What do we mean by "your vote ... Eric Gorr
- RE: [EM] What do we mean by 'your vote c... Bill Lewis Clark
- [EM] Your Vote Counts! (silly voting methods) Jan Kok
- Re: [EM] Your Vote Counts! (silly voting met... Kevin Venzke
- Re: [EM] Your Vote Counts! (silly voting... Eric Gorr
- Re: [EM] Your Vote Counts! (silly v... Kevin Venzke
- Re: [EM] Your Vote Counts! (sil... Eric Gorr
- [EM] YVC vs. EMMM Jan Kok
- Re: [EM] David Gamble reply, 1/23/03 1012 GMT Dgamble997
- Re: [EM] David Gamble reply, 1/23/03 1012 GMT Markus Schulze
- Dgamble997
