No one's alternatives to FBC have resembled mine, and I think my "weak" version is wrong, but I don't see what's wrong with my "strong" version. Any comments from anyone? Did I leave a loophole of some kind?
Keeping in mind that this criterion is supposed to be unattainable: --- Kevin Venzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Strong FBC: Lowering some candidate X from sole first place to some other > position (including equal first place) on a set of identical ballot(s) should > not improve the result of the election from the perspective of the original > ballot. Kevin Venzke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo! Mail : votre e-mail personnel et gratuit qui vous suit partout ! Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.benefits.yahoo.com/ ---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info