Messages by Date
-
2005/03/07
Re: [EM] Equal-ranking in Condorcet, SCRIRVE (was" Condorcet-Approval hybrid method")
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/07
Re: [EM] Markus, "majority-rejected", and some Markus opinions
Markus Schulze
-
2005/03/07
[EM] Re: chain climbing methods
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/03/07
[EM] Methods that apply to more than MinMax :-)
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/07
[EM] Later no harm, Condorcet, and randomization
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/03/07
[EM] Equal-ranking in Condorcet, SCRIRVE (was" Condorcet-Approval hybrid method")
Chris Benham
-
2005/03/07
[EM] Equal Rankings in Real World Voting Systems
Alex Small
-
2005/03/07
[EM] Ballot integrity (Was 'Re: "margins vs. winning votes" and Woodall's "Plurality" criterion')
Ted Stern
-
2005/03/07
[EM] Markus, "majority-rejected", and some Markus opinions
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/07
[EM] Russ, SFC, and wv vs margins
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/07
Re: [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/07
Re: [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Russ Paielli
-
2005/03/06
Re: [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/03/06
Re: [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Daniel Bishop
-
2005/03/06
Re: [EM] Re: Cardinal Pairwise
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/06
[EM] I have to rescind my method (a better one exists)
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/06
[EM] Re: Cardinal Pairwise
Steven Barney
-
2005/03/06
Re: [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Russ Paielli
-
2005/03/06
Re: [EM] "margins vs. winning votes" and Woodall's "Plurality" criterion
Markus Schulze
-
2005/03/06
[EM] FBC and several favorites
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/06
[EM] Briefer demonstration for Better-Than-Expectation
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/06
Re: [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/06
[EM] "margins vs. winning votes" and Woodall's "Plurality" criterion
Chris Benham
-
2005/03/06
Re: [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Daniel Bishop
-
2005/03/05
[EM] my last post: a clarification
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/05
Re: [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Russ Paielli
-
2005/03/05
[EM] Re: chain climbing methods
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/05
Re: [EM] Cardinal Pairwise
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/05
Re: [EM] SFC and "margins vs. winning votes"
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/05
[EM] A Recursive Lottery Shell
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/05
Re: [EM] SFC and "margins vs. winning votes"
Daniel Bishop
-
2005/03/05
Re: [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/05
Re: [EM] A method satisfying Minimal Defense and much Later-no-harm
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/05
Re: [EM] A method satisfying Minimal Defense and much Later-no-harm
Russ Paielli
-
2005/03/05
Re: [EM] SFC and "margins vs. winning votes"
Russ Paielli
-
2005/03/05
RE: [EM] Ok, it was Gore, not Kerry in 2000.
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/03/05
Re: [EM] Ok, it was Gore, not Kerry in 2000.
Russ Paielli
-
2005/03/05
Re: [EM] SFC and "margins vs. winning votes"
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/05
[EM] A method satisfying Minimal Defense and much Later-no-harm
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/05
Re: [EM] Ok, it was Gore, not Kerry in 2000.
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/05
[EM] SFC and "margins vs. winning votes"
Russ Paielli
-
2005/03/05
Re: [EM] Yes: FBC must speak of a set of same-preference, same-voting voters
Markus Schulze
-
2005/03/05
[EM] Markus, Gibbard-Satterthwaite
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/05
[EM] Yes: FBC must speak of a set of same-preference, same-voting voters
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/05
[EM] Markus, 2 March, '05, 1317
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/05
[EM] The resolute model?
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/05
[EM] Russ´s Better-Than-Expectaton derivation (was "no subject")
Chris Benham
-
2005/03/05
[EM] Ok, it was Gore, not Kerry in 2000.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/05
[EM] Why my criteria
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/05
[EM] Why my criteria
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/05
[EM] Margins fails FBC, with 3 candidates
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/04
Re: [EM] Russ´s Better-Than-Expectaton derivation (was "no subject")
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/04
Re: [EM] Russ´s Better-Than-Expectaton derivation (was "no subject")
Russ Paielli
-
2005/03/04
[EM] Russ´s Better-Than-Expectaton derivation (was "no subject")
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/04
[EM] Paul, 4 March, '05, 1450 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/04
Re: [EM] Markus, I'll clarify your answer
Markus Schulze
-
2005/03/04
[EM] Chain Climbing methods
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/03/04
[EM] Kevin, 4 March, '05, 1310 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/04
[EM] Markus, I´ll clarify your answer
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/04
[EM] BeatpathWinner/CSSD and FBC
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/03
Re: [EM] No, Random Candidate doesn´t meet FBC (as of now)
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/03
Re: [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/03/03
Re: [EM] Exactly: Voting systems that allow true preference expression
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/03
Re: [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/03
[EM] An axiomatic definition of "preference"
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/03/03
Re: [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/03/03
Re: [EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/03
[EM] Poll/Approval Strategies and Lotteries
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/03
[EM] "strategy" of IRV advocates
Ted Stern
-
2005/03/03
[EM] Russ, 3 March, '05, 1730 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/03
[EM] Methods that pass SFC
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/03
[EM] Exactly: Voting systems that allow true preference expression
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/03
[EM] No, Random Candidate doesn´t meet FBC (as of now)
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/03
[EM] Condorcet-Approval hybrid method
Russ Paielli
-
2005/03/03
Re: [EM] Russ, 2 March, 1952 GMT
Russ Paielli
-
2005/03/02
[EM] Russ, 2 March, 1952 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/02
Re: [EM] R. B. MacSmith
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/02
Re: [EM] Russ reply, 2 March, ´05, 1151 GMT
Russ Paielli
-
2005/03/02
[EM] Preference Cascades
Ted Stern
-
2005/03/02
Re: [EM] (no subject)
Russ Paielli
-
2005/03/02
[EM] Random Ballot Needle Point
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/02
[EM] No, that isn´t SFC either. Endless guessing games?
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/03/02
Re: [EM] Markus, 2 March, 1349 GMT
Markus Schulze
-
2005/03/02
Re: [EM] Markus, 2 March, '05, 1317 GMT
Markus Schulze
-
2005/03/02
[EM] Kevin, 2 March, ´'5, 1425 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/02
[EM] Re: optimal Condorcet truncation
Chris Benham
-
2005/03/02
[EM] Markus, 2 March, 1349 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/02
[EM] Markus, 2 March, ´05, 1317 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/02
[EM] Markus, 2 March, ´05, 1130 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/02
[EM] Russ reply, 2 March, ´05, 1151 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/01
Re:[EM] R. B. MacSmith
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/01
Re:[EM] R. B. MacSmith
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/01
Re: [EM] Kevin, 1 March, 1918 GMT
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/01
[EM] Terminology and precision of definitions
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/03/01
[EM] No, that isn´t SFC either. Endless guessing games?
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/03/01
Re: [EM] Markus, 1 March, ´05, 1800 GMT
Markus Schulze
-
2005/03/01
Re: [EM] To Paul & Markus, about criteria definedness
Markus Schulze
-
2005/03/01
[EM] Kevin, 1 March, 1918 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/01
RE: [EM] Russ, 1 March, ´05, 1850 GMT
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/03/01
[EM] Russ, 1 March, ´05, 1850 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/01
[EM] Typo: CW, not sincere Smith set
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/01
[EM] No, that isn´t SFC either. Endless guessing games?
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/01
[EM] Markus, 1 March, ´05, 1800 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/01
[EM] To Paul & Markus, about criteria definedness
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/01
Subject: Re: [EM] Re: Markus, criteria
Alex Small
-
2005/03/01
[EM] Deriving Better-Than-Expectation from Weber´s strategic values
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/01
[EM] (no subject)
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/01
Re: [EM] Markus, criteria
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/01
Re: [EM] Markus, criteria
Markus Schulze
-
2005/03/01
Re: [EM] Markus, criteria
Markus Schulze
-
2005/02/28
Re: [EM] Re: Markus, criteria
Russ Paielli
-
2005/02/28
Re: [EM] Re: Markus, criteria
Alex Small
-
2005/02/28
Re: [EM] Re: optimal Condorcet truncation
Russ Paielli
-
2005/02/28
Re: [EM] Simple Election Methods and Geometry
Alex Small
-
2005/02/28
Re: [EM] optimal Condorcet truncation
Gervase Lam
-
2005/02/28
Re: [EM] Criteria
Jim & Mary Ronback
-
2005/02/28
Re: [EM] Russ, Criteria that mention preference
Russ Paielli
-
2005/02/28
Re: [EM] Re: Markus, criteria
Russ Paielli
-
2005/02/28
Re: [EM] Approval strategy for Condorcet?
Russ Paielli
-
2005/02/28
Re: [EM] Simple Election Methods and Geometry
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/02/28
Re: [EM] Markus, criteria
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/02/28
[EM] R.B.MacSmith
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/02/28
Re: [EM] Who First Proposed Winning Votes?
Markus Schulze
-
2005/02/28
Re: [EM] Meaning of preference, four approaches
Markus Schulze
-
2005/02/28
[EM] Approval strategy for Condorcet?
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/02/28
[EM] Russ, Criteria that mention preference
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/02/28
[EM] Re: Who first proposed wv
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/02/28
[EM] More comments on approaches to preference
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/02/28
Re: [EM] Markus, criteria
Markus Schulze
-
2005/02/27
[EM] Simple Election Methods and Geometry
Alex Small
-
2005/02/27
Re: [EM] Re: Markus, criteria
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/02/27
Re: [EM] Markus reply
Russ Paielli
-
2005/02/27
Re: [EM] Markus reply
Markus Schulze
-
2005/02/27
Re: [EM] Markus reply
Markus Schulze
-
2005/02/27
Re: [EM] Meaning of preference, four approaches
Markus Schulze
-
2005/02/27
Re: [EM] Meaning of preference, four approaches
Russ Paielli
-
2005/02/27
Re: [EM] Markus reply
Russ Paielli
-
2005/02/27
[EM] Re: Markus, criteria
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/02/27
RE: [EM] Meaning of preference, four approaches
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/02/27
[EM] Meaning of preference, four approaches
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/02/27
[EM] Re: optimal Condorcet truncation
Chris Benham
-
2005/02/26
Re: [EM] optimal Condorcet truncation
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/02/26
[EM] optimal Condorcet truncation
Russ Paielli
-
2005/02/26
Re: [EM] Markus reply
Markus Schulze
-
2005/02/26
Re: [EM] Who First Proposed Winning Votes?
Markus Schulze
-
2005/02/26
Re: [EM] Markus reply
Markus Schulze
-
2005/02/26
Re: [EM] Markus reply
Russ Paielli
-
2005/02/26
[EM] Alex reply
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/02/26
Re: [EM] Why bicameralism ?
Stephane Rouillon
-
2005/02/26
[EM] Who first proposed wv Condorcet
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/02/26
Re: [EM] Why bicameralism ?
Stephane Rouillon
-
2005/02/26
[EM] Markus, criteria (was Markus reply)
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/02/26
[EM] Markus, criteria (was Markus reply)
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/02/26
Re: [EM] Who First Proposed Winning Votes?
Markus Schulze
-
2005/02/25
[EM] axioms for lotteries
Forest Simmons
-
2005/02/25
[EM] Re: Who First Proposed Winning Votes?
Dgamble997
-
2005/02/25
Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/02/25
[EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx
Ted Stern
-
2005/02/25
[EM] Enough is enough
Alex Small
-
2005/02/25
[EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx
Ted Stern
-
2005/02/25
Re: [EM] Markus reply
Markus Schulze
-
2005/02/25
[EM] Russ and his pecking order
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/02/25
[EM] Russ and the pecking-order
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/02/25
[EM] Markus reply
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/02/25
Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/02/25
[EM] Russ reply, 1235 GMT, 2/25/05
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/02/25
Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx
Daniel Bishop
-
2005/02/25
Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/02/25
Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx
Russ Paielli
-
2005/02/24
Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/02/24
[EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx
Daniel Bishop
-
2005/02/24
Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/02/24
Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx
Daniel Bishop
-
2005/02/24
Re: [EM] EM criteria discussions
Russ Paielli
-
2005/02/24
[EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx
Ted Stern
-
2005/02/24
Re: [EM] Russ asks about my criteria
Russ Paielli
-
2005/02/24
[EM] Re: Condorcet package
Rob LeGrand
-
2005/02/24
Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/02/24
Re: [EM] EM criteria discussions
Markus Schulze
-
2005/02/24
[EM] Re: Condorcet package
Ted Stern
-
2005/02/24
[EM] Re: Condorcet package
Ted Stern
-
2005/02/24
RE: [EM] Re: Condorcet package
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/02/24
RE: [EM] Re: Condorcet package
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/02/24
[EM] Re: Condorcet package
Ted Stern
-
2005/02/24
[EM] Re: Condorcet package
Ted Stern
-
2005/02/24
[EM] EM criteria discussions
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/02/24
[EM] Re: Condorcet package
Ted Stern
-
2005/02/24
[EM] Re: Condorcet package
Ted Stern
-
2005/02/24
[EM] Russ asks about my criteria
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/02/23
Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet package
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/02/23
Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet package
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/02/23
RE: [EM] Acronyms need to spelled out
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/02/23
[EM] Acronyms need to spelled out
Jim & Mary Ronback
-
2005/02/23
Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet package
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/02/23
Re: [EM] Omission from equilibrium criteria. Renaming.
Russ Paielli
-
2005/02/23
Re: [EM] Approval strategy at Russ´s website
Russ Paielli
-
2005/02/23
[EM] Re: Condorcet package
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/02/23
[EM] Approval strategy at Russ´s website
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/02/23
[EM] Re: Comments on Approval strategy posting
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/02/23
Re: [EM] Re: Approval strategy reply
Russ Paielli