At 7:07 PM -0800 2/11/04, Steve Eppley wrote:
Eric Gorr wrote:
 At 10:59 AM -0800 2/11/04, Steve Eppley wrote:
 -snip-
 >It also expects to be given a list of the alternatives, but
 >sometime in the near future I intend to post a version that
 >constructs the list of alternatives by examining the votes.

> Will will not work if all voters leave one or more of
 the available options unranked. Perhaps not a big issue,
 but it is why, with my calculator, I ask for the number
> of options.


If every vote omits an alternative, I don't see a need to
include it in the reported results.

True, probably not necessary...as I said, not a big issue.


Of course, the other problem with this style of input is that a typo in an option would be counted as two or more options. Again, easy to fix, for the user, but I tend to prefer interfaces that minimize the potential for user error, requiring them to go back and fix a mistake.

How does Eric's calculator handle write-in candidates?

The write-in candidates are just an addition option and I ask for the total number of options.



---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to