Mike pointed out: >> You've used "<" where you meant ">".
James Gilmour wrote: > It is interesting that several others have commented on these examples > without, apparently, "seeing" these mistakes. On my part, was it just > 12 stupid typos, the effect of the ">" in the margin, or a Freudian > slip of much greater significance? It could also be that there are perfectly reasonable (if nonstandard) interpretations under which either direction can be used to mean the same thing. "A<B" might mean B is greater than (better than) A -- or it might mean that when placing A and B in order, A comes first. It depends whether you understand the "<" to compare cardinalities such as utility, or to simply indicate order. -wclark -- Protest the 2-Party Duopoly: http://votenader.org/ ---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info