Dear Craig, you wrote (30 Jan 2005): > Mr MARKUS SCHULZE seems to have a life project out of doing research > into all the graduations between: > > · (1) deliberately misdefining something, and > > · (2) defining something in a way that deliberately inadequate. > > That is such a grave and gross problem that I had Mr Schulze > moderated at my 2 mailing lists on voting: politicians-and-polytopes, > single-transferable-vote.
That's not true. You moderated me because I wrote that I consider independence of clones important. It is very strange when someone is moderated for writing that he considers independence of clones important at a mailing list that claims to be about proportional representation by the single transferable vote. Markus Schulze ---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
