On 2/10/05 2:45 PM, "Markus Schulze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here, Mike Ossipoff proposes another subcycle rule: > http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/1998-Jun > e/001721.html > > Also this subcycle rule violates Pareto. Therefore, subcycle rules were > not discussed anymore since June 1998.
Was the example for how this violated Pareto posted to the list? ---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
