Mike,
--- MIKE OSSIPOFF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
> Yes, Random did meet FBC, till I posted this message. I´m adding brief
> wording to FBC, so that Random Candidate (RC) won´t meet FBC. Then FBC will
> be acting in the spirit and intent of FBC even if the method is RC.
You hate RC so much that FBC has to do double-duty now? Why can't you just
make a "nonrandom criterion"?
> The Non-Random versions of those criteria are, of course, strictly speaking,
> rules-criteria. I´ve said that I don´t like rule-criteria. But when the only
> rules stipulation is that the method be a nonrandom method, that isn´t a
> rules criterion in the objecionable sense, since all the main proposals are
> nonrandom methods, and nonrandom methods are the only ones proposable as a
> first voting system reform proposal.
I can't believe you would justify *criteria* based on what is "proposable" or
a "main proposal."
Kevin Venzke
Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 250 Mo d'espace de stockage pour vos mails !
Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.mail.yahoo.com/
----
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
