Mike, you wrote:
>your quote of Jobst's
>definition of the immune set suggests that your version of it was
>correct,
>and Markus's quotation of it was incorrect. Of course Markus will never
>admit that, and will post forever, attempting to convincingly act as if
>he
>believes that he wasn't incorrect.
I don't understand what makes you say this. When has Markus made an
incorrect statement of the immune set, and what was this incorrect
definition? As far as I know, Markus and I agree on the definition of the
immune set, but you err by stating that it is identical to the beatpath
winner set. In my last message I gave an example where these two sets are
different.
Sincerely,
James
----
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
