MIKE OSSIPOFF <nkklrp <at> hotmail.com> writes: > > I'd said: > > >You said: > > > >Could you please show proof that WV (RP/Beatpath/River) passes > >Consistency and CWP does not? > > Hi Mike, > > I'm getting weary of the sloppy quoting > > I reply: > > What sloppy quoting? Did you or did you not say:
Read what I said. Remember what I've contacted you about before. I meant standard email protocol: Name <address> wrote [on date]: > > etc. > with threaded Subject header. I do appreciate that you've managed to fix your apostrophes, and I see that sometimes you can insert leading ">" signs. Read the other suggestions and give them a try. Please! Honestly, you're a bit like my cousin who says "strange that those 4 other clocks are wrong -- I know my wristwatch is accurate! I've checked it 10 times" when he is 5 minutes slower than the official US atomic clock. A.A. ---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info