It's true that we we don't discuss most voting systems here--only the ones
that we really like.
(But we discuss IRV and Borda a little, just because they're fairly
frequently proposed or mentioned in popular articles).
Nanson meets Condorcet's Criterion, but it fails all the defensive strategy
criteria, and Monotonicity. I don't know what, if any, criteria Nanson
meets, other than Condorcet's Criterion. But even if it meets some, it fails
the ones that I consider important, the ones that relate to getting rid of
the notorious lesser-of-evils problem.
Mike Ossipoff
_________________________________________________________________
Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
----
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
