[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Warren Smith wrote:
--Actually, as a math PhD, what I understand is that the
Condorcet criterion is NOT "already well-defined"
This mystifies me. I've long understood the Condorcet criterion
to mean that if one candidate would defeat all others in one to one
contests, that candidate is the Condorcet winner.
Indeed. The Condorcet Criterion is well-defined...I too am mystified why
or how anyone could claim anything but.
----
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
