But if you do consider 2-party system to be democracy, then if you like 2-party domnation state, why bother to consider any voting system other than plurality at all?
I mean, plurality (1) maximally leads to the situation (2 parties) you like, and (2) if there are only 2 candidates, then plurality is as good as any other more "advanced" system, so debating advnaced systems is almost pointless. Why leads me to ask of people who believe in 2-party-dominance: why are you here on EM? It is essential to have systems which break 2-party dominance. Otherwise, they will be effectively just the same as 2-choice plurality and it is pointless to consider their "advantages". wds ---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
