http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/Definite_Majority_Choice
When it comes to the handling of ties, what objections would there be to using Eppley's Random Voter Hierarchy (RVH - http://alumnus.caltech.edu/~seppley/MAM%20procedure%20definition.htm)?
It seems likely that injecting some possible randomness into an otherwise deterministic method would reduce the potential for strategic manipulation.
Furthermore, it would make the complete explanation of DMC far similar then having to explain the six stages after which one still may(?) end up with an unresolved tie and no predefined way to resolve it.
---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
