At 07:11 PM 9/14/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, among the things that would happen should an accurate polling be
sufficient to successfully strategically vote would be the creation of voters who would no longer supply accurate information to the poll takers.

Many of those discussing election methods assume that disciplined coordination of voters on a large scale is impractical. This is true under present conditions.

However, if my own work is successful, voters will organize outside the public political process in such a way as to form organizations making recommendations that are trustworthy by design. (That is, the recommendations are made by those enjoying the highest collected trust, and are confirmed and passed down through representatives personally chosen on a scale where the voter probably knows the rep personally, or at least has been willing to place trust in the person.)

The organizations would be advisory only, so the Free Association concepts are possible. What these do is to maximize the possibility of consensus. Factions know that if they hold to a narrow view, they will weaken the support for that view, because there will be opposing factions. If they can find consensus positions, they will be far more powerful. And, because of the DP structure, factions will quickly know exactly how successful they have been at finding such positions.

So disciplined voting is entirely possible. Basically, FA/DP is a generic solution to half of the generic governmental problem, the communications half. It is not a control mechanism, FA concepts guarantee that control remains with the individual members at all times. Power is not concentrated in FA, except for the power to advise, and even that is moderated through legions of independent proxies. It should be *extremely* hard to corrupt, so hard, in fact, that a special interest would be better advised to join the FA and seek consensus solutions within it.

http://beyondpolitics.org/wiki

----
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to