Messages by Date
-
2003/03/04
Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument
Forest Simmons
-
2003/03/04
Re: [EM] Markus: MMC. Why WV vs Margins matters.
Markus Schulze
-
2003/03/03
Re: [EM] Who did you say won?
Alex Small
-
2003/03/03
Re: [EM] Who did you say won?
Bart Ingles
-
2003/03/03
[EM] Vermont IRV can elect a fanatical candidate
Jan Kok
-
2003/03/03
Re: [EM] Markus: MMC. Why WV vs Margins matters.
Adam Tarr
-
2003/03/03
MMC vs "25%" slippage checkboxes (was Re: [EM] Blake's Margins Arguments
Craig Carey
-
2003/03/03
RE: [EM] Who did you say won?
Adam Tarr
-
2003/03/03
[EM] Markus: MMC. Why WV vs Margins matters.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2003/03/03
Re: 3-valued Booleans inside rules, passing Condorcet (Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)
Craig Carey
-
2003/03/03
Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument
Steve Barney
-
2003/03/03
Re: [EM] Blake's Margins Arguments
Markus Schulze
-
2003/03/03
Re: Blake's Margins Arguments
Craig Carey
-
2003/03/03
RE: [EM] Who did you say won?
Narins, Josh
-
2003/03/03
Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument
Forest Simmons
-
2003/03/03
Re: 3-valued Booleans inside rules, passing Condorcet (Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)
Markus Schulze
-
2003/03/02
Re: Blake's Margins Arguments
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2003/03/02
Re: 3-valued Booleans inside rules, passing Condorcet (Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)
Dave Ketchum
-
2003/03/02
Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)
Craig Carey
-
2003/03/02
Re: 3-valued Booleans inside rules, passing Condorcet (Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)
Craig Carey
-
2003/03/02
Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)
Markus Schulze
-
2003/03/02
RE: 3-valued Booleans inside rules, passing Condorcet (Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)
James Gilmour
-
2003/03/02
[EM] 03/01/03 - Another error in Craig's argument:
Donald Davison
-
2003/03/01
Re: 3-valued Booleans inside rules, passing Condorcet (Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)
Dave Ketchum
-
2003/03/01
Re: [EM] Might IRV adoption be inevitable?
Alex Small
-
2003/03/01
Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)
Craig Carey
-
2003/03/01
Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument
Steve Barney
-
2003/03/01
RE: [EM] Might IRV adoption be inevitable?
James Gilmour
-
2003/03/01
Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)
Markus Schulze
-
2003/03/01
Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)
Stephane Rouillon
-
2003/03/01
3-valued Booleans inside rules, passing Condorcet (Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)
Craig Carey
-
2003/03/01
Re: [EM] Might IRV adoption be inevitable?
Markus Schulze
-
2003/03/01
Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)
Markus Schulze
-
2003/03/01
RE: [EM] Might IRV adoption be inevitable?
James Gilmour
-
2003/03/01
Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)
Stephane Rouillon
-
2003/03/01
[EM] Aim of unfairness suggests denial of an implicitness problem
Craig Carey
-
2003/02/28
Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)
Markus Schulze
-
2003/02/28
Re: Proof Vermont method isn't mopnotonic (Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)
Markus Schulze
-
2003/02/28
Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)
Jan Kok
-
2003/02/28
Proof Vermont method isn't mopnotonic (Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)
Craig Carey
-
2003/02/28
Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)
Stephane Rouillon
-
2003/02/28
Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)
Markus Schulze
-
2003/02/28
Re: [EM] IRV and Condorcet operating identically
Dave Ketchum
-
2003/02/28
Re: [EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)
Craig Carey
-
2003/02/27
Re: [EM] 'More often' (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)
Alex Small
-
2003/02/27
Re: [EM] MCA cut off points arbitrary?
Gervase Lam
-
2003/02/27
RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument
Forest Simmons
-
2003/02/27
RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument
Steve Barney
-
2003/02/27
RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument
Steve Barney
-
2003/02/27
Re: [EM] MCA cut off points arbitrary?
Forest Simmons
-
2003/02/27
[EM] "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)
Jan Kok
-
2003/02/27
Re: [EM] IRV and Condorcet operating identically
Venzke Kevin
-
2003/02/26
Re: [EM] MCA cut off points arbitrary?
Gervase Lam
-
2003/02/26
Re: [EM] Duverger's Law
Alex Small
-
2003/02/26
[EM] Duverger's Law
Forest Simmons
-
2003/02/26
Re: [EM] Might IRV adoption be inevitable?
Markus Schulze
-
2003/02/25
Re: Blake's margins arguments
Olli Salmi
-
2003/02/25
Re: [EM] Might IRV adoption be inevitable?
Dave Ketchum
-
2003/02/25
Re: [EM] Might IRV adoption be inevitable?
Dave Ketchum
-
2003/02/25
Re: [EM] MCA cut off points arbitrary? [Was: Hello (Intro); PR, Condorcet and Approval, variants...]
Alex Small
-
2003/02/25
[EM] MCA cut off points arbitrary? [Was: Hello (Intro); PR, Condorcet and Approval, variants...]
Gervase Lam
-
2003/02/25
Re: [EM] Majority Choice Approval and Bucklin
Adam Haas Tarr
-
2003/02/25
Re: [EM] Majority Choice Approval and Bucklin
Gervase Lam
-
2003/02/25
RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument
Forest Simmons
-
2003/02/25
[EM] IRV bills introduced in NYS Assembly
Douglas Greene
-
2003/02/25
RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument
Steve Barney
-
2003/02/25
Re: [EM] Might IRV adoption be inevitable?
ericgorr
-
2003/02/25
Re: [EM] Might IRV adoption be inevitable?
Alex Small
-
2003/02/25
RE: [EM] Vermont IRV is nonstandard
James Gilmour
-
2003/02/25
[EM] Vermont IRV is nonstandard
Jan Kok
-
2003/02/25
[EM] Might IRV adoption be inevitable?
Venzke Kevin
-
2003/02/24
Re: [EM] Who did you say won?
Bart Ingles
-
2003/02/24
Re: Blake's margins arguments
Bart Ingles
-
2003/02/24
Re: [EM] Borda different than Condorcet?
Alex Small
-
2003/02/24
Re: Blake's margins arguments
Blake Cretney
-
2003/02/24
Re: [EM] Borda different than Condorcet?
Blake Cretney
-
2003/02/24
Re: [EM] Borda different than Condorcet?
Alex Small
-
2003/02/24
Re: [EM] Borda different than Condorcet?
Adam Tarr
-
2003/02/24
Re: [EM] Borda different than Condorcet?
Alex Small
-
2003/02/24
[EM] Borda different than Condorcet?
stephane . rouillon
-
2003/02/24
Re: [EM] Your opinion on being able to vote no preference?
Alex Small
-
2003/02/24
[EM] Your opinion on being able to vote no preference?
Tom McIntyre
-
2003/02/24
Re: [EM] Who did you say won?
Eric Gorr
-
2003/02/24
Re: [EM] Who did you say won?
Tom McIntyre
-
2003/02/24
Re: [EM] Who did you say won?
Eric Gorr
-
2003/02/23
[EM] Who did you say won?
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2003/02/23
Re: Blake's margins arguments
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2003/02/23
[EM] You, too, can be a lobbyist!
Jan Kok
-
2003/02/23
[EM] Voting site updated
ericgorr
-
2003/02/23
Re: [EM] theory vs practice
ericgorr
-
2003/02/22
[EM] theory vs practice
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2003/02/22
Re: [EM] Fw: [InstantRunoffNYS] Digest Number 52
Bart Ingles
-
2003/02/21
RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument
Steve Barney
-
2003/02/21
RE: election-methods-digest Digest V103 #31
Steve Barney
-
2003/02/21
Re: [EM] Blake's margins arguments
Forest Simmons
-
2003/02/21
Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument
Forest Simmons
-
2003/02/21
[EM] Fw: [InstantRunoffNYS] Digest Number 52
Douglas Greene
-
2003/02/21
Re: [EM] Majority Choice Approval and Bucklin
matt matt
-
2003/02/21
[EM] On good terms
AVnow
-
2003/02/20
Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument
Alex Small
-
2003/02/20
Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument
Forest Simmons
-
2003/02/20
[EM] The Strong FBC (fwd)
Forest Simmons
-
2003/02/20
Re: [EM] Strong FBC
Forest Simmons
-
2003/02/20
Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument
Forest Simmons
-
2003/02/20
Re: [EM] Majority Choice Approval and Bucklin
Forest Simmons
-
2003/02/20
Re: [EM] Hello (Intro); PR, Condorcet and Approval, variants...
Venzke Kevin
-
2003/02/20
Re: [EM] Hello (Intro); PR, Condorcet and Approval, variants...
matt matt
-
2003/02/20
[EM] Salon.com article on voting machines
Alex Small
-
2003/02/20
Re: [EM] Majority Choice Approval and Bucklin
Alex Small
-
2003/02/20
Re: [EM] invitation to participate in encyclopedia
Rob Lanphier
-
2003/02/19
[EM] invitation to participate in encyclopedia
Dan Keshet
-
2003/02/19
Re: [EM] Majority Choice Approval and Bucklin
Venzke Kevin
-
2003/02/19
Re: [EM] Majority Choice Approval and Bucklin
Adam Tarr
-
2003/02/19
Re: [EM] Majority Choice Approval and Bucklin
Venzke Kevin
-
2003/02/19
Re: [EM] Majority Choice Approval and Bucklin
Alex Small
-
2003/02/19
Re: [EM] Majority Choice Approval and Bucklin
Venzke Kevin
-
2003/02/19
Re: [EM] Hello (Intro); PR......
Venzke Kevin
-
2003/02/19
Re: [EM] IRV update and approval vs. range
Alex Small
-
2003/02/19
RE: [EM] Hello (Intro); PR, STV......
Venzke Kevin
-
2003/02/19
Re: [EM] Hello (Intro); PR, Condorcet and Approval, variants...
Venzke Kevin
-
2003/02/19
Re: [EM] Hello (Intro); PR, Condorcet and Approval, variants...
matt matt
-
2003/02/19
Re: [EM] Blake's margins arguments
matt matt
-
2003/02/19
[EM] IRV update and approval vs. range
Douglas Greene
-
2003/02/19
Re: [EM] Blake's margins arguments
Blake Cretney
-
2003/02/19
Re: [EM] Steph: Extremist shouldn't change outcome?
Stephane Rouillon
-
2003/02/19
Re: [EM] Blake's margins arguments
Stephane Rouillon
-
2003/02/19
Re: [EM] Hello (Intro); PR......
Stephane Rouillon
-
2003/02/19
Re: [EM] Hello (Intro); PR......
Stephane Rouillon
-
2003/02/19
Re: [EM] Blake's margins arguments
Bart Ingles
-
2003/02/19
Re: [EM] Blake's margins arguments
Adam Tarr
-
2003/02/19
Re: [EM] Blake's margins arguments
Rob LeGrand
-
2003/02/19
RE: [EM] Hello (Intro); PR......
James Gilmour
-
2003/02/19
Re: [EM] Blake's margins arguments
Alex Small
-
2003/02/19
Re: [EM] Blake's margins arguments
Rob LeGrand
-
2003/02/19
Re: [EM] Blake's margins arguments
Forest Simmons
-
2003/02/19
Re: [EM] Hello (Intro); PR......
Venzke Kevin
-
2003/02/19
Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument
Alex Small
-
2003/02/19
Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument
Alex Small
-
2003/02/19
Re: [EM] Hello (Intro); PR, Condorcet and Approval, variants...
Stephane Rouillon
-
2003/02/18
[EM] Hello (Intro); PR, Condorcet and Approval, variants...
Venzke Kevin
-
2003/02/18
[EM] Final reply to Tom McIntyre
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2003/02/18
Re: Blake's margins arguments
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2003/02/18
Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument
Steve Barney
-
2003/02/18
Re: [EM] Strong FBC
Alex Small
-
2003/02/18
Re: [EM] Blake's margins arguments - CORRECTION
AVnow
-
2003/02/18
Re: [EM] Blake's margins arguments
AVnow
-
2003/02/18
RE: [EM] election-methods-list moving
Narins, Josh
-
2003/02/18
Re: [EM] Blake's margins arguments
Adam Tarr
-
2003/02/18
Re: [EM] Blake's margins arguments
AVnow
-
2003/02/18
[EM] Blake's margins arguments
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2003/02/17
Re: [EM] Condorcet's Words
Stephane Rouillon
-
2003/02/17
Re: [EM] Condorcet's Words
Markus Schulze
-
2003/02/16
Re: [EM] election-methods-list moving
Adam Tarr
-
2003/02/16
[EM] election-methods-list moving
Rob Lanphier
-
2003/02/15
Re: [EM] The interactive BeatpathWinner & RP count website
Blake Cretney
-
2003/02/14
[EM] Strong FBC
Forest Simmons
-
2003/02/13
[EM] Condorcet's Words Part II
Stephane Rouillon
-
2003/02/12
[EM] Matt Matt: websites too have freedom of choice
Alex Small
-
2003/02/11
Re: Other website?
Adam Tarr
-
2003/02/11
Re: Other website?
matt matt
-
2003/02/11
[EM] Matt Matt: websites too have freedom of choice
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2003/02/10
Re: Other website?
Adam Tarr
-
2003/02/10
Re: Other website?
matt matt
-
2003/02/09
Re: Other website?
Adam Tarr
-
2003/02/08
Re: Other website?
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2003/02/08
Re: [EM] Interesting Article
Markus Schulze
-
2003/02/06
[EM] Other website?
matt matt
-
2003/02/06
Re: [EM] Name that Criterion
Forest Simmons
-
2003/02/06
Re: [EM] Name that Criterion
Alex Small
-
2003/02/06
Re: [EM] Name that Criterion
Eric Gorr
-
2003/02/06
[EM] Name that Criterion
Forest Simmons
-
2003/02/06
RE: Population paradox
Narins, Josh
-
2003/02/05
[EM] Fallacy in Strong FBC Proof
Alex Small
-
2003/02/05
[EM] Other website?
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2003/02/05
Re: Population paradox
Joseph Malkevitch
-
2003/02/05
RE: Population paradox
Forest Simmons
-
2003/02/05
Re: Population paradox
Joe Weinstein
-
2003/02/05
[EM] Interesting Article
Alex Small
-
2003/02/05
Re: Population paradox
Joseph Malkevitch
-
2003/02/05
Re: Population paradox
Joseph Malkevitch
-
2003/02/05
Re: Population paradox
Joseph Malkevitch
-
2003/02/05
RE: Population paradox
Narins, Josh
-
2003/02/05
Re: Population paradox
Olli Salmi
-
2003/02/05
RE: Population paradox
Narins, Josh
-
2003/02/05
RE: Population paradox
Narins, Josh
-
2003/02/04
Re: [EM] To Marquette, to Marquette ...
Dave Ketchum
-
2003/02/04
Re: Population paradox
Joseph Malkevitch
-
2003/02/04
RE: Population paradox
Forest Simmons
-
2003/02/04
Re: Population paradox
Joe Weinstein
-
2003/02/04
Re: [EM] Condorcet's Words, Part I
Stephane Rouillon
-
2003/02/04
RE: Population paradox
Narins, Josh
-
2003/02/03
Re: Population paradox
Joe Weinstein
-
2003/02/03
[EM] [OT] Computerized Counting
Narins, Josh
-
2003/02/02
Re: [EM] The interactive BeatpathWinner & RP count website
matt matt
-
2003/02/02
Re: [EM] The interactive BeatpathWinner & RP count website
ericgorr
-
2003/02/01
[EM] The interactive BeatpathWinner & RP count website
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2003/02/01
[EM] My Voting Site - updated
ericgorr
-
2003/02/01
Re: [EM] "population paradox" using largest remainder with small # of voters?
Adam Tarr
-
2003/02/01
Re: [EM] "population paradox" using largest remainder with small# of voters?
Olli Salmi
-
2003/01/31
[EM] Markus: Marquette
MIKE OSSIPOFF