[EM] Schwartz criterion

[Blake Cretney]

MIKE OSSIPOFF wrote:
> But my statement that you quoted, and that I quoted in the paragraph
> before last is obviously true, even outside the context in which
> I used it. It _is_ obvious that the members of an innermost unbeaten
> set are uniquely deserving of winning. 

It isn't obvious to me.  Is there another defense for this criterion,
beyond the defense of obviousness.

---
Blake Cretney