Messages by Thread
-
[EM] Approval & UUCC
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] new URL
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Good introductory site
Bart Ingles
-
[EM] What happened?
David Catchpole
-
[EM] SARC definition improvement
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] count software
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Borda Count
Venus Greenhouse
-
[EM] New voting system website. Comments sought.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] DISASTER!
David Catchpole
-
[EM] Cyberian Electoral Commissioner's Friend and accompanying legislation.
David Catchpole
-
DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA
Mail System Internal Data
-
Re: Only 5 candidates needed for SD nonmonotonicity
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Schwartz//Tideman for meetings & small committees
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Candidate Vote Transfer Proportional Representation Method
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Schwartz criterion
Blake Cretney
-
Re: Problems with finding the probable best governor
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Schwartz Criterion & Tideman
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Various Criteria and the 3 matrices
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] I understated the CW-SU relationship.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Majority Rule
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Oops. Sincere points assignment maximizes SU.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Problems with finding the probable best governor
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Adding or Removing Choices
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Upper/Middle/Lower choices
DEMOREP1
-
Re: Monotonicity, but Participation too
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Cycles and subgroups
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Voting Software
Blake Cretney
-
[EM] Monotonicity, but Participation too
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] True, the SD example is possible.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] SD example--incomplete. Has error?
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Confirmed -- SD is not monotonic.
Norman Petry
-
[EM] Markus: Tideman wording
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Dropping SD
Blake Cretney
-
Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze - Reply Part 2
Norman Petry
-
Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze - Reply Part 1
Norman Petry
-
[EM] 3 Choices/6 Sums
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY v. JONES
DEMOREP1
-
Re: [EM] Another false quote made by Mike
Markus Schulze
-
[EM] Markus doesn't listen well, & repeats same error
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Another false quote made by Markus
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] A really good introduction to strategic probability and game theory!
David Catchpole
-
[EM] small typo in SSD definition
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Criterions vs. Methods
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Decisiveness of MTM & Schulze
Steve Eppley
-
[EM] London mayoral elections/SV
Bart Ingles
-
[EM] SSD & BeatpathWinner
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
Re: Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] Desperate to use Pareto?
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Head-to-head: Schulze vs. MTM (majoritarian Tideman)
Steve Eppley
-
[EM] Useful Propositions re: clones & tie-breaking
Steve Eppley
-
[EM] Papers can have the last preference filled
Craig Carey
-
RE: Approval Vote: The unfairness of being dead
DEMOREP1
-
Re: Ooh... I think he's riled. (fwd)
David Catchpole
-
[EM] Approval Vote: The unfairness of being dead
Craig Carey
-
[EM] Ooh... I think he's riled.
David Catchpole
-
[EM] Approval Vote: 99% isn't enough
DEMOREP1
-
[EM] tied clones retraction
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
[EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze
Norman Petry
-
Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze
Steve Eppley
-
Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze
Markus Schulze
-
Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze
Markus Schulze
-
Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze
Markus Schulze
-
Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze
Markus Schulze
-
Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze
Markus Schulze
-
Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze
Markus Schulze
-
Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze
Markus Schulze
-
Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze
Markus Schulze
-
Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze
Markus Schulze
-
Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze
Markus Schulze
-
Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze
Markus Schulze
-
Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze
Markus Schulze
-
Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
Re: [EM] Fw: IBCM, Tideman, Schulze
MIKE OSSIPOFF
[Earlier messages] [Later messages]